Who! I wonder why not Warren? I don’t know much about Loveland.Ok then
He's a better blocker. Great player, slight reach maybe but he wasn't going to last much longer. I would have traded back but I'm guessing nobody wanted a player that bad that they thought they had to trade upWho! I wonder why not Warren? I don’t know much about Loveland.
He's a better blocker. Great player, slight reach maybe but he wasn't going to last much longer. I would have traded back but I'm guessing nobody wanted a player that bad that they thought they had to trade up
Johnson also uses multiple tight ends in his offense at DetroitI watch almost all Michigan games. I like Loveland as a pass reciever but not so much as a blocker. I do like the pick.
I think Kmet is good but they are not using him well in the offense. Three WRs are getting all the targets and Kmet mainly used as a blocker. Kmet was the Bears main weapon that made that offense go when they would target him.
He got drafted at 10 because of his receiving skill not blocking. Time will tell how he progresses on the blocking front.I watch almost all Michigan games. I like Loveland as a pass reciever but not so much as a blocker. I do like the pick.
I think Kmet is good but they are not using him well in the offense. Three WRs are getting all the targets and Kmet mainly used as a blocker. Kmet was the Bears main weapon that made that offense go when they would target him.
This does seem like a Ben Johnson pick. Seems like he envisions Loveland as a Bears’ version of Sam Laporta, a TE who is primarily a receiver.Johnson also uses multiple tight ends in his offense at Detroit