-
Locked
2024 IHSFCA Class 2A All State Team
- By EdgyTim
- Edgy's Lost His Mind Free Football Board
- 1 Replies
Not the same Warren defense you're used to. They gave up over 30 points in 3 of their 4 loses.Your insinuating the York vs Warren won’t have any defense with scoring that high for two teams that run the ball.
And let's not forget Charlie Bliss, former QB coach at MS, retired CFD, now at Loyola.Park Ridge origins of 2 coaches
I am not sure he will say that. The 2005 team was pretty special offensively and defensively. Of course I am a bit partial to that team my son was a part of. 😊LWE's closest game is 21 pts. They have scored 40 points in 8 of 10 games.
They will beat Stevenson by at least 28.
I predict they win state by over 21 pts.
Coach Z will tell everyone at the end of the season this is the best team he has coached.
Your insinuating the York vs Warren won’t have any defense with scoring that high for two teams that run the ball.Gimme Beast in a drubbing 49-7
Got Loyola on a Buzzer FG 31-28
LT 24-17
Warren in a 1 hour 15 minute game 42-35
Gimme Beast in a drubbing 49-78A QTRS who you got and why
Game 25 — #9 Lincolnshire (Stevenson) (10-1) at #1 Frankfort (Lincoln-Way East) (11-0), Fri., Nov. 15, 7:00 pm.
Game 26 — #20 Park Ridge (Maine South) (8-3) at #12 Wilmette (Loyola Academy) (9-2), Sat., Nov. 16, 1:30 pm
Game 27 — #7 Naperville (Central) (10-1) at #2 LaGrange (Lyons) (11-0), Fri., Nov. 15, 7:00 pm
Game 28 — #27 Gurnee (Warren) (7-4) at #14 Elmhurst (York) (9-2), Fri., Nov. 15, 7:30 pm
LWE running clock. 49-0
Maine South in 20-17
LTHS 31-28
Warren 49-48
Per the CFP website.The CFP committee only SEEDS 12 teams for a spot to play in the playoffs..
Sure. But isnt that essentially what happens now to a degree when the conf champ goes 9-0 in an inferior conf and gets a higher seed because they have a better record than a 2nd place team from a much tougher conf? THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I AM TRYING TO PREVENT! Its like you understand my point but you are doing everything you can not to admit it.
I have also never advocated for IHSA conf champs to receive priority seeding.
Correct, there is a difference when ranking vs. seeding the top 12, but the only difference is that the top 4 RANKED conference champs get the top 4 SEEDS and the 5th RANKED conference champ gets into the playoffs regardless of their rank. The criteria used to determine their RANK does not change to determine their SEED. It's only based on whether they win their conference.There is 100% a difference in how they RANK the top 12 and how they SEED the top 12. Both rankings and seeding play a role in the playoff bracket.
It's like he's going out of his way to prove he's not a running QB.
It's like he's going out of his way to prove he's not a running QB.At minimum Caleb needs to run forward with the ball and get out of bounds or slide for whatever yardage he can get. Don't run east and west forever behind the line of scrimmage.
If this is not an option then throw the ball away
Question, is Williams holding on to the ball a function of the play calling and the receivers not getting open? Add the worst o-line in the league and its no wonder that he is failing.
It’s gonna be a great game. SF is playing some good ball at the right time.Massey has Sycamore as a 6 point favorite.
When seeding, its generally not a reflection of who is the presumed best team. Or who will win a given matchup. Its more about who put together the best resume (Sos, quality wins, fewest bad losses, etc) up until the point of seeding. Yes, upsets happen and we see the "bracket busters" all the time in the NCAAT, but I don't think we should assume the committees got it wrong in that instance. Ie, i dont think the committee got it wrong just because FDU beat Purdue, or Loyola upsets Illinois.@jhi get it, i do. You think the assumed best team should have the easiest path to the championship. And I agree we generally have a good idea of who the best teams are. My issue is when you give those alleged best teams the easiest path even when their record has some blemishes on it it then becomes a self fulfilling prophecy, not making it because they're better, instead making it because they had an easy path. One their regular season didn't deserve.
Furthermore if the computer seedings don't go chalk then they were wrong in the first place. The chances of them going chalk are next to none. I do prefer the seedings not being based on the alleged best team, but rather the best records and then best playoff points. Perhaps we could tweak the playoff points to only include the teams you beat (this would change all the non 9-0 seedings).
The luck of the draw is one of the good things about the playoffs and my squad never gets the luck of the draw whether 9-0 or 5-4 yeah it sucks going home earlier than expected but eventually you gotta beat the good teams if you're good.