Why hasn't public/private never been put up for a member wide vote? People want to either put it to an end, separate etc. so why not just vote and be done with it?
Your thoughts?
Your thoughts?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why hasn't public/private never been put up for a member wide vote? People want to either put it to an end, separate etc. so why not just vote and be done with it?
Your thoughts?
I am all for separating private v public.
Do you mean regular season and playoffs?
Very good points that I did not consider.Private schools would have to be broken up into one class, possibly two...I mean how many private schools qualified for the playoffs last year state wide? MC, LA, BR, Naz, Montini, JCA, IC, Iggy, Benet, Marist, Bishop Mac, ND.....that’s 12, I know I’m missing more then a few but I’m not sure how it would work. I’m not against it, especially if districts go through, but it would definitely be a huge change. I know Texas does it but they have hundreds more private schools then Illinois.
Private schools would have to be broken up into one class, possibly two...I mean how many private schools qualified for the playoffs last year state wide? MC, LA, BR, Naz, Montini, JCA, IC, Iggy, Benet, Marist, Bishop Mac, ND.....that’s 12, I know I’m missing more then a few but I’m not sure how it would work. I’m not against it, especially if districts go through, but it would definitely be a huge change. I know Texas does it but they have hundreds more private schools then Illinois.
If I were in favor, only playoffs. Teams schedule who they want in non-con. If they want a competitive game they schedule it.Do you mean regular season and playoffs?
If I were in favor, only playoffs. Teams schedule who they want in non-con. If they want a competitive game they schedule it.
Yeah, just playoffs. Schools generally play competitive non-con games. For example Montini knows where they belong when it comes to non-con, they play Palatine, Loyola, LWE, Maine South, ESL etc. It's only a problem when the playoffs start and the mismatches happen.Am I missing something or are the playoffs really the only reason you would separate the schools.
Yeah, just playoffs. Schools generally play competitive non-con games. For example Montini knows where they belong when it comes to non-con, they play Palatine, Loyola, LWE, Maine South, ESL etc. It's only a problem when the playoffs start and the mismatches happen.
Enrollment classification makes sense for boundried schools in relation to each other.Well then let’s just stop having classifications based on school size and let some panel make subjective decisions based on how good they think a team is... that sounds like a great plan! We can get it down to 3 classes... 3A equals elite teams, 2A equals good teams, 1A equals the average teams that barely qualified for the playoffs.
Well then let’s just stop having classifications based on school size and let some panel make subjective decisions based on how good they think a team is... that sounds like a great plan! We can get it down to 3 classes... 3A equals elite teams, 2A equals good teams, 1A equals the average teams that barely qualified for the playoffs.
Yeah, just playoffs. Schools generally play competitive non-con games. For example Montini knows where they belong when it comes to non-con, they play Palatine, Loyola, LWE, Maine South, ESL etc. It's only a problem when the playoffs start and the mismatches happen.
Why wouldn't you want to play the toughest schedule every year? Who wants to win against weaker competition?
Why hasn't public/private never been put up for a member wide vote? People want to either put it to an end, separate etc. so why not just vote and be done with it?
Your thoughts?
Why hasn't public/private never been put up for a member wide vote? People want to either put it to an end, separate etc. so why not just vote and be done with it?
Your thoughts?
you might want to fix those opponents as of late. Seems like Coach A knew where they belonged.Yeah, just playoffs. Schools generally play competitive non-con games. For example Montini knows where they belong when it comes to non-con, they play Palatine, Loyola, LWE, Maine South, ESL etc. It's only a problem when the playoffs start and the mismatches happen.
Who are the more recent games against?you might want to fix those opponents as of late. Seems like Coach A knew where they belonged.
I think 2 Cps last year and same this yearWho are the more recent games against?
you might want to fix those opponents as of late. Seems like Coach A knew where they belonged.
I think 2 Cps last year and same this year
Without even bothering to read anything but the first post, I'm going to assume that not a single post has anything to do with what the actual student-athletes want, but rather just what the adults want.
Am I close?
While you construct your grand new Catholic conference, do you think any Loyola football player gives a damn?Student athletes just want to be allowed to play. The adults who run the IHSA have always seemed more interested in legislating parity and in who can't play.
While you construct your grand new Catholic conference, do you think any Loyola football player gives a damn?
You're not constructing anything at the moment, is probably a better way to phrase that. All I'm saying is that every time this debate comes up, the only thing anyone seems to ever care about is what the adults want, and not what the players want.I'm not constructing anything, grand or otherwise. Districts have made that all a moot point.
You're not constructing anything at the moment, is probably a better way to phrase that. All I'm saying is that every time this debate comes up, the only thing anyone seems to ever care about is what the adults want, and not what the players want.
And maybe I'm wrong. Maybe the Loyola players didn't want to play Lincoln-Way East, and maybe the Lincoln-Way East players didn't want to play Loyola - but I think we all doubt that.
I'm just glad those high school athletes got to play in a great game, in a great atmosphere without the egos of the adults, and petty arguments about recruiting and multipliers getting in the way.
Based on everything I've posted in this thread, what would lead you to believe that I wouldn't want input from the players on a variety of topics?I understand what you are driving at. If you are going to ask the players for their input on separating private schools from the IHSA, then let's also ask for their input about multipliers, recruiting radii, transfer rules, etc.
Could you, specifically, just stop this nonsense? Anyone who has posted or lurked on this message board has seen that you for years have railed on this to absolute no avail. You've even come up with your own idea for a conference and divisions, and I'm guessing you did that for no one but the amusement of yourself and the few that agree with you. I'm also guessing that you've never once seriously looked into joining some kind of group to put that together, nor have spoken to any CCL official to get something like this started.ramblinman said:Me too. The problem is, there are only so many straws that the private school camel can carry on its back. One of these days, the IHSA will add one straw too many and you'll be sorry you preferred to look the other way while all the previous straws were being loaded.
Based on everything I've posted in this thread, what would lead you to believe that I wouldn't want input from the players on a variety of topics?
Could you, specifically, just stop this nonsense? Anyone who has posted or lurked on this message board has seen that you for years have railed on this to absolute no avail. You've even come up with your own idea for a conference and divisions, and I'm guessing you did that for no one but the amusement of yourself and the few that agree with you. I'm also guessing that you've never once seriously looked into joining some kind of group to put that together, nor have spoken to any CCL official to get something like this started.
You're an adult, shouting at the rain, ruining everyone's good time.
I don't believe that at all. I'm simply saying that if you want their input about separating private schools from the IHSA, then let's open it up to ask them about other issues as well.
Lighten up, Francis.
For the record, I didn't start this thread. Edgy started it. He even entitled it in such a way as to imply that he was looking for spirited posts. I responded to Edgy's initial post, and received likes for my response from several people, including Edgy.
You are the one who elected to goad me in to further posts about the public/private issue. Why, if not for your own amusement? I took your bait because it amused me to do so. I say what I say here mostly for my own amusement. Why would anyone post here if they didn't enjoy it?
I'm a fan, not an administrator. People rail on things all the time here...most of the time to no avail. Do you really think I'm going to stop because you and others don't like it? If you don't like it, TS. The web is a big place; go somewhere else if you don't like people railing here. You could also activate the ignore feature, or just bite your tongue and don't provoke people if you don't like it when they take your bait.
If you asked the Loyola players who they would want to play they would respond like most kids and say area teams like new trier,glen brooks,Stevenson,warren,main south,notredame etc
Districts will be good for some and bad for others,teams like Loyola,Maine south,notredame,Barrington Stevenson,warren will get to have some great regular season games.Now Loyola plays tough schedule but others do not.True. Which why I like the district concept as it specifically applies to Loyola.
However, if the anti private school bias within the IHSA gets to the point of being too onerous (some would argue we passed that point long ago), then I wouldn't blame Loyola and other private schools if they were to decide to go their own way.