Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MC/Batavia still in the 3rd Q. 3:00 and change leftHow much time do I have?
Batavia “back in it” I guess means they won’t get clocked. I wouldn’t bank on it thoughGot cold, came inside ... saw the last score and the announcer suggestion that Batavia is back in it.
Have time to step out again before the Big Boys!
7-0 LA. 80 yard flea flicker for TD on their 1st play from scrimmage.Score?
Ball hit the LWE player before he made contact that’s why it wasn’t calledKick catch interference not flagged against LWE. 15 yds should have been added to Loyola possession
I find it funny that we somehow have a better look on Tv than an official standing 20 feet away.This East scoring drive was stopped and the refs screwed it up with that spot.
Ball hit the LWE player before he made contact that’s why it wasn’t called
Originally Posted by 2009 Case Book 6.5.6 SITUATION D: K1’s punt is high but short. R2, from well down field, runs toward the ball to get in position to attempt to catch it. K2 is also moving toward the ball or just standing there when: (a) K2 is contacted by R2; or (b) K2 causes R2 to veer away from the ball but there is no contact by K2. The ball strikes the ground and is recovered by R3. RULING: K2 has committed kick-catching interference in both (a) and (b) since K2 did not provide R2 an unmolested opportunity to catch the ball. |
Well the line judges actions walking back from his original 2 yard gain spot showed me he didn’t see it too well eitherI find it funny that we somehow have a better look on Tv than an official standing 20 feet away.
So what is the ruling if it hits the K team (1st touching) before he makes contact with the returner? I think that’s what the back judge saw and why it wasn’t flagged. As a back judge it’s the first thing I’m looking at.
Originally Posted by 2009 Case Book
6.5.6 SITUATION D: K1’s punt is high but short. R2, from well down field, runs
toward the ball to get in position to attempt to catch it. K2 is also moving toward
the ball or just standing there when: (a) K2 is contacted by R2; or (b) K2 causes
R2 to veer away from the ball but there is no contact by K2. The ball strikes the
ground and is recovered by R3. RULING: K2 has committed kick-catching interference
in both (a) and (b) since K2 did not provide R2 an unmolested opportunity
to catch the ball.
Did someone hijack your account? This post is very unlike youThis East scoring drive was stopped and the refs screwed it up with that spot.
Wrong:Ball hit the LWE player before he made contact that’s why it wasn’t called
I don't find incompetence funny.I find it funny that we somehow have a better look on Tv than an official standing 20 feet away.
It’s kick catch interference by definition because the receiving team was not given unmolested access to the ball.So what is the ruling if it hits the K team (1st touching) before he makes contact with the returner? I think that’s what the back judge saw and why it wasn’t flagged. As a back judge it’s the first thing I’m looking at.
Become an official and you too can be incompetent like the rest of us!I don't find incompetence funny.
It’s not easy, that’s for sure, but these two non-calls were pretty egregious.Become an official and you too can be incompetent like the rest of us!
Did someone hijack your account? This post is very unlike you
So you cannot talk about bad calls unless you ref…….Become an official and you too can be incompetent like the rest of us!
I am an official.Do you cannot talk about bad calls unless you ref…….