brucealmighy said:

Come on. They have plenty of talent on that roster. He is a great player but others are performing as well with less talent around them.

Click to expand...

I get your point but I look at it this way:
1) the team’s running game only works because he is such a dynamic threat as a runner. The game he missed and when he first came back from injury and was seemingly not as aggressive with his runs then the ground game disappeared.
2) the team defense has been torched several games this season putting the
Pressure to score on virtually every possession squarely on the QB’s shoulders.
3) there has to be an enormous amount of pressure to win at Mt.Carmel yet the qb performs as though he thrives under that pressure.
I totally get that there are other great players on teams that would be ordinary without them.
But Mt. Carmel love them or hate them, is likely a top 5 team in the state out of 500 programs this year and the qb is the reason that is so.

You're welcome just didn't want this thread to turn into a ref bash when it wouldn't have been justified.

FWIW, I had no rooting interest in the game. My son and I were just bouncing around NFHS and caught the last 7 minutes of the game.

4Afan said:

Game cannot end on a defensive penalty, but it can end on an offensive penalty. The penalty was accepted, but there was no time on the clock.

Click to expand...

Do you happen to know the rationale behind this? Just curious cause I think this is different than in the NFL

good_nocall said:

It could have been 42 and if so I apologize for the confusion. The kid ran straight down the middle of the field which I think is where you can see 42 until the ball is released and then he runs over to where the play finished.

If the NFHS video or another presnap video becomes available, somebody please link and I can mark up the problem with the formation.

Click to expand...

Yeah agreed definitely a penalty. Appreciate the insight we were confused

Silver Rain said:

No. But Rita has a good bench. This year was predetermined, preordained.

Click to expand...

Congratulations Mt. Carmel. Impressive.

bmlaken said:

You can’t see the formation in this video but assume you’re talking 42 in which case if he was covered definitely this was the caseVideo

Click to expand...

It could have been 42 and if so I apologize for the confusion. The kid ran straight down the middle of the field which I think is where you can see 42 until the ball is released and then he runs over to where the play finished.

If the NFHS video or another presnap video becomes available, somebody please link and I can mark up the problem with the formation.

bmlaken said:

Do you understand or anyone else why there would not be an untimed down then since the penalty was accepted? I think I’ve heard that it’s correct that it’s not just would like to know what rule specifies that

Click to expand...

Game cannot end on a defensive penalty, but it can end on an offensive penalty. The penalty was accepted, but there was no time on the clock.

Chocked on it.

good_nocall said:

#22 was lined up as a tight end (three point stance) on Unity's right side of the line. You also had trips in a bunch to the far right, with the middle of the bunch lined up on the ball. Not sure what his number was because i was focused on if 22 was actually going to pass protect, which he did not. The guy on the ball to the outside "covers" #22 in that case, making #22 ineligible by formation.

Click to expand...

Do you understand or anyone else why there would not be an untimed down then since the penalty was accepted? I think I’ve heard that it’s correct that it’s not just would like to know what rule specifies that

RockSoup said:

So today, can the St. Rita D mitigate, to an extent, the Mt. Carmel O explosiveness?
Can the St. Rita O effectively force the Mt. Carmel D to cover the whole field on each down mitigating the size and speed advantage of Mt. Carmel’s front 7?
Can the St. Rita O tactically deploy major misdirection plays on any down and at any spot on the field to steal field position and/or score 6?

Click to expand...

No. But Rita has a good bench. This year was predetermined, preordained.

LakeCtyNewt said:

Their FB rushed for 227 yards and two touchdowns today so I think they didn’t missed him too much.

Click to expand...

Today, maybe not. If it were next week, for sure. Missing the extra points is what did them in today. Enough about CG, at least from me. Woulda, coulda. It’s Geneva’s turn.

Come join us and show us how it’s done

rjjtwest said:

With all due respect but you guy’s need to keep it real and get your head out thee ol’ bum!

Click to expand...

You won 42-7, right?

good_nocall said:

#22 was lined up as a tight end (three point stance) on Unity's right side of the line. You also had trips in a bunch to the far right, with the middle of the bunch lined up on the ball. Not sure what his number was because i was focused on if 22 was actually going to pass protect, which he did not. The guy on the ball to the outside "covers" #22 in that case, making #22 ineligible by formation.

Click to expand...

You can’t see the formation in this video but assume you’re talking 42 in which case if he was covered definitely this was the caseVideo

rjjtwest said:

With all due respect but you guy’s need to keep it real and get your head out thee ol’ bum!

Click to expand...

Elaborate

Not trying to open up a can, but 3A has frequently been awesome with crazy finishes when it’s between the publics.

good_nocall said:

#22 was lined up as a tight end (three point stance) on Unity's right side of the line. You also had trips in a bunch to the far right, with the middle of the bunch lined up on the ball. Not sure what his number was because i was focused on if 22 was actually going to pass protect, which he did not. The guy on the ball to the outside "covers" #22 in that case, making #22 ineligible by formation.

Click to expand...

Got it absolutely agree with this just didn’t see it

Kids seemed way jacked up for this game. Coaches need to control this better. Rouse had every right to retaliate but should not have. But, he's only a kid.
Far too many motion penalties. I’m sure some were due to hijinks but the Morris D line. Seen this before.
Nice to be in the finals…will be tough to beat Naz. Very tough.

Man, Johnston City is really taking it on the chin right now

Come on. They have plenty of talent on that roster. He is a great player but others are performing as well with less talent around them.

bmlaken said:

Can you explain why he was ineligible? Just curious because from our perspective he was lined up as the running back. Just wondering

Click to expand...

#22 was lined up as a tight end (three point stance) on Unity's right side of the line. You also had trips in a bunch to the far right, with the middle of the bunch lined up on the ball. Not sure what his number was because i was focused on if 22 was actually going to pass protect, which he did not. The guy on the ball to the outside "covers" #22 in that case, making #22 ineligible by formation.

If reports coming from CP have someone in the BBQ area telling one specific fan to "Suck a D ..." well, he was chanting "Bought and Paid For" as he walked past us. Not my fault.

Althoff played excerpts over the PA of an interview the CP coach gave about Althoff not belonging in 1A and recruiting but that they only needed to shut down Dierre and they would be fine. Ooops ....

Get the Fenwick lawyers on the case