ADVERTISEMENT

1A/2A/3A Quarterfinals

I am looking forward to Bismarck coming to Chicago Christian's first ever home playoff game in the quarterfinals or beyond. Many of y'all get year after year of prime playoff matchups for your teams, so this is a some prime rib for hungry CCHS fans.

I agree with doctor d - that QND and Maroa game is a great one.
Chicago Christian has a great opportunity in a wide open 2A. looking forward to this game.

1A/2A/3A Quarterfinals

I am looking forward to Bismarck coming to Chicago Christian's first ever home playoff game in the quarterfinals or beyond. Many of y'all get year after year of prime playoff matchups for your teams, so this is a some prime rib for hungry CCHS fans.

I agree with doctor d - that QND and Maroa game is a great one.

Higher seeds should get the home game.

@jhi get it, i do. You think the assumed best team should have the easiest path to the championship. And I agree we generally have a good idea of who the best teams are. My issue is when you give those alleged best teams the easiest path even when their record has some blemishes on it it then becomes a self fulfilling prophecy, not making it because they're better, instead making it because they had an easy path. One their regular season didn't deserve.

Furthermore if the computer seedings don't go chalk then they were wrong in the first place. The chances of them going chalk are next to none. I do prefer the seedings not being based on the alleged best team, but rather the best records and then best playoff points. Perhaps we could tweak the playoff points to only include the teams you beat (this would change all the non 9-0 seedings).

The luck of the draw is one of the good things about the playoffs and my squad never gets the luck of the draw whether 9-0 or 5-4 yeah it sucks going home earlier than expected but eventually you gotta beat the good teams if you're good.

Higher seeds should get the home game.

Wow, really? Where to begin. The same criteria is used to rank the top 25 teams. Thst right there refutes any point you are trying to make.

Georgia is out and the top 4 are shuffled because one of the stipulations for the playoffs is that the top 5 ranked conference leaders get in, and the top 4 of those receive a bye so Boise St. jumps them being a conference leader, not due to some other formula for ranking them. There's not one formula to rank the top 25 and then another for the top 12, they get shuffled due to conference leaders, that's it, no different formula.

Apply this Logic to the IHSA playoffs and both Loyola and Marist would have lower rankings because each division of the CCL/ESCC doesn't have enough teams for the IHSA to crown a conference champion so there would be a number of conference champs seeded ahead of them using this method.

Besides why would you cite this method as it doesn't ensure the best teams meet in the quarters or later?
jha618's point is valid. While the committee may rank the top 25 teams, the playoff bracket does not get seeded in strict accordance with the rankings. The top four seeds will always be the champions of the Big Ten, SEC, ACC, and Big Twelve Conferences. That is true regardless of where those four champions are ranked. That is why Miami, which is ranked 9th, is seeded 4th for the playoff (as things presently stand).

jha618 is also correct to provide the NCAA basketball tournament as an example that supports his case. An organization can, and many do, use different criteria for qualifying teams for a playoff/tournament, and then seeding teams for the tournament. Roughly 25% of the participants in the NCAA basketball tournament each year would not qualify for the tournament based on power rankings, or based on a committee's vote evaluating team strength. They qualify only because they are a conference champion. They then get seeded by the tournament committee.

The World Cup soccer tournament is an example of a tournament that only seeds the top eight teams. The remaining 24 national teams are assigned to the eight groups randomly. So, yes, some people think that too is a reasonable way to run a tournament.

You, "4Afan", have your preferences regarding the structure of the Illinois high school football playoffs. Many people agree with you. Some others do not. There is at least some merit to both points of view. You would be more influential in presenting your case if others could trust that, at times, you might agree there is some logic to points they are making. This is especially true when they provide ample evidence supporting those points.
  • Like
Reactions: jha618

Higher seeds should get the home game.

Wow, really? Where to begin. The same criteria is used to rank the top 25 teams. Thst right there refutes any point you are trying to make.
The CFP committee only SEEDS 12 teams for a spot to play in the playoffs..
Georgia is out and the top 4 are shuffled because one of the stipulations for the playoffs is that the top 5 ranked conference leaders get in, and the top 4 of those receive a bye so Boise St. jumps them being a conference leader, not due to some other formula for ranking them. There's not one formula to rank the top 25 and then another for the top 12, they get shuffled due to conference leaders, that's it, no different formula.
Rankings and seedings are not synonymous. Stop using them interchangeably. Its going to be very hard for you to understand any of what im saying if you don't know the difference between those two words. There is 100% a difference in how they RANK the top 12 and how they SEED the top 12. Both rankings and seeding play a role in the playoff bracket.
Apply this Logic to the IHSA playoffs and both Loyola and Marist would have lower rankings because each division of the CCL/ESCC doesn't have enough teams for the IHSA to crown a conference champion so there would be a number of conference champs seeded ahead of them using this method.
Sure. But isnt that essentially what happens now to a degree when the conf champ goes 9-0 in an inferior conf and gets a higher seed because they have a better record than a 2nd place team from a much tougher conf? THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I AM TRYING TO PREVENT! Its like you understand my point but you are doing everything you can not to admit it.

I have also never advocated for IHSA conf champs to receive priority seeding.
Besides why would you cite this method as it doesn't ensure the best teams meet in the quarters or later?
It absolutely does. #1 seed cant match up with #2 seed until the championship game. Isnt that what you want?

CS8 Playoffs Thread - Quarterfinals - 3 Left Alive

Flashing back to the earliest days of the summer, U-High defeated Cahokia handily in the SIU 7on7 tournament, so they’re semi-familiar with each other. Almost every U-High player from that competition is still healthy, so that should be nice. Of course it was a while ago and when you add pads everything changes, but it at least helps U-High’s case proving that they have the capability to keep up with Cahokia, and perform well after long road trips.

Higher seeds should get the home game.

Sigh. You were so close. The top 12 seeds didnt come from the top 12 "power ranked" teams. Several teams seeds and "power rankings" are different. Only 2 of the top 4 seeds (automatic bids) came from the top 4 "power ranked" teams. Georgia is "power ranked" #12 but isn't in the CFP field of 12 teams. How would that happen if they didnt seed and rank teams based on different criteria? I really didnt think I needed to explain it out that far.
Wow, really? Where to begin. The same criteria is used to rank the top 25 teams. Thst right there refutes any point you are trying to make.

Georgia is out and the top 4 are shuffled because one of the stipulations for the playoffs is that the top 5 ranked conference leaders get in, and the top 4 of those receive a bye so Boise St. jumps them being a conference leader, not due to some other formula for ranking them. There's not one formula to rank the top 25 and then another for the top 12, they get shuffled due to conference leaders, that's it, no different formula.

Apply this Logic to the IHSA playoffs and both Loyola and Marist would have lower rankings because each division of the CCL/ESCC doesn't have enough teams for the IHSA to crown a conference champion so there would be a number of conference champs seeded ahead of them using this method.

Besides why would you cite this method as it doesn't ensure the best teams meet in the quarters or later?
  • Like
Reactions: gobears25

Higher seeds should get the home game.

Way to miss the point. All of those were examples of tournaments that use a qualification and seeding process that you claim doesn't exist and/or can't work. It was a very basic comp. But apparently too confusing for you.
Your point is about as sharp as a ping pong ball. If no one here gets your point just maybe your not making one.
  • Haha
Reactions: Gene K.

8a QTRS

Beast-I think this one will get ugly. Lincoln Way East halftime adjustments are top notch.
Swagger-no explanation needed.
NC-lots of former Maine South representation on staff. Also Lyons is getting no respect. If I knew more about them, maybe I would pick them.
York-if Warren gets behind, they are doomed! If not, they’ve got a chance.
At NC, the pre-game staff introduction over the P.A. actually references the Park Ridge origins of the 2 coaches. At least the awkwardness of this will be avoided since NC and MS can not meet in Naperville this season given the brackets.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT