ADVERTISEMENT

IHSA Adjusts Classification Cycle Board Meeting

What's the earliest state series that starts? Seems like they'd have 4 weeks if that is when State Board has info? Or does it take additional time before state board publishes that data as well?

The state still hasn't published the fall counts to my knowledge. Plus Golf starts around end of September and Volleyball and Soccer seeds come out beginning of October.

IHSA Adjusts Classification Cycle Board Meeting

What's the earliest state series that starts? Seems like they'd have 4 weeks if that is when State Board has info? Or does it take additional time before state board publishes that data as well?
This is just me speculating - but Oct 1 is the first date they CAN report them, I haven't found a deadline for reporting them as its numbers as of the last day of September. I imagine you potentially run into a problem with delinquent submissions and I'd imagine there is some sort of verification process since there is likely funding tied to the numbers.
  • Like
Reactions: Snetsrak61

IHSA Adjusts Classification Cycle Board Meeting

The one year enrollment number is a no-brainer. I wish it was current school year as schools can report their enrollments on Oct 1, but realize that's too short a deadline.
What's the earliest state series that starts? Seems like they'd have 4 weeks if that is when State Board has info? Or does it take additional time before state board publishes that data as well?

IHSA Adjusts Classification Cycle Board Meeting

As someone who just found out that there are two separate rule charters - IHSA By-Laws and Board Policy - can someone tell me which one dictates playoff setup? I imagine that has to be a by-law. I'm not wanting to launch that discussion in yet another thread, I just want to know for sure.

The one year enrollment number is a no-brainer. I wish it was current school year as schools can report their enrollments on Oct 1, but realize that's too short a deadline.

Private Schools 7 - Public Schools 1. That’s a wrap!

Sac’um,

If they are prepared for the workforce what work are they to do with the Basics? Basic math does not prepare you for College or really the trades as evidenced by the OP’s post about sitting for the apprentice test.

@snets,

I may have judged you a bit harsher than I should have as I thought you were joining yourself to Sac’ums comments which tend to IMHO poopoo the trades. I just want to see kids prepared for the world and this general basic education pushes kids through the system unprepared for said world. Apologies!
Think of public education as a concrete foundation. Whatever you can build on top of that foundation is up to you. The gov't just makes sure that you have a foundation to build on. That is all. Want to be a doctor, good, build it. Want to be an electrician, good, build it. What I do not want is a system where K-12 administrators decide who gets a foundation and who doesn't.

A Tradition Unlike Any Other

And LP changed dramatically, from lower-middle-class whites to Puerto Ricans to upper-middle-class whites swept in by gentrification. And now they have a shiny new school that reflects the image they have of themselves..

Obviously "Lincoln Park gentrified in the 70s and 80s" is factually accurate, but I'm not sure it's relevant to DP's recent success - all of the dynamics that have made it succeed are rooted way more recently than that.

First of all, the demise of GT is entirely unrelated to gentrification in Lincoln Park (but perhaps not unrelated to demographic changes in North Center and the surrounds) - GT never drew heavily from LP and enrollment tanked well after LP was fully gentrified.

Second, DP is not in Lincoln Park nor does it draw a majority of students from there. LP has been gentrified for 50 years now and most of the parents of DP kids likely have little to no knowledge of that history.

In my opinion, there was a huge unmet demand on the North side broadly (not just LP) for a co-ed Catholic school that was cheaper, more convenient, and less "intense" than Ignatius (and maybe somewhat Loyola). Having a new building is great, but I think the draw is the opposite of a "shiny new school that reflects the image they have of themselves" - It was for a more "normal" private school for the vast majority of families in the area vs the relative "extremes" (can mean cost, distance, rigor/acceptance rate, etc.) of the super fancy non-parochial privates, selective enrollment, Ignatius/Loyola, etc.

Private Schools 7 - Public Schools 1. That’s a wrap!

Sac’um,

If they are prepared for the workforce what work are they to do with the Basics? Basic math does not prepare you for College or really the trades as evidenced by the OP’s post about sitting for the apprentice test.

@snets,

I may have judged you a bit harsher than I should have as I thought you were joining yourself to Sac’ums comments which tend to IMHO poopoo the trades. I just want to see kids prepared for the world and this general basic education pushes kids through the system unprepared for said world. Apologies!
I really don't think sac'um was poo pooing the trades as hard as you think either to be honest. Some of the language (like the mines) was obviously hyperbolic, but even he had posted clear language with support of trades.

At the end of the day, I think there's plenty that you and I still wouldn't agree on. But I just want kids to be given options and with their parents guidance to make the choice to make the best option. Maybe that is some state run vocational programs (whether single track secondary programs aimed at those with highest risk of failing to obtain a traditional HS diploma or post secondary investments in Community College programs that cater to trades). But I'd defer to HS diploma being the baseline and that more time in middle and high is spent on a wide range of skills which probably should include some basic and standard vocational skills (if none other, at least computer and typing skills please, for all track kids) as a standard and not elective, and full credit. Current laws really damper some of the ability to do that though.

But trades encompasses A LOT of different stuff. I think these convos sometimes veer to spending a lot of time on seemingly unicorn ones. But a lot are just normal jobs that very clearly have limited lifetime earnings potential. Which is fine, but I think most people would want to explore the option of choosing potentially higher earning career tracks and make that decision. And I heard an interesting convo recently which is that a lot of "underperforming" desk job people would turn their back very quickly on many of the higher paying trades once they saw the physical demands (often long term physical toll). One good example was people finding out recently how much UPS workers were making in their latest contract negotiations. And then the realization from those same people that is a very physically demanding career. My neighbor made a great honest living as a garbage man. Secure earnings, great pension, perfectly respectable living... And a back that is totally wrecked and has needed many surgeries. There are serious risks too. The full pro/con picture of any route and not the romanticized version is key for every person to make an informed decision. Obviously on the College track that's the serious cost and risk of debt (especially if you fail to complete the degree). Especially for what is often money spent on not really critical to the educational experience (the college lifestyle $).

Other times the risk is just instability of work. Early in his career my dad worked in high rise construction. When it was "on" they pay was REALLY good. But it was lots of long days/weeks at 1.5x pay and then would dry up until the next job came, which was uncertain. He did that for about a decade before choosing a more steady but lower ceiling income in fire/paramedic once he had 4 kids. Some trades are like that and it's a lot to ask someone even at 18 or 23 to consider that long term commitment. So flexibility and broad skills IS really important imo. By the way, he's one of those people who could have gone the desk route. Had a college degree thanks to sports. Spent one year in insurance and hated it and never went back. He ultimately really loved paramedic especially because he felt called to serve people and that allowed it.

So no I have zero disdain for trades. And I've also seen first hand the overly pro college track pushed. I was probably always going to be that college track and my mom especially pushed against my desire to explore non college routes like military (including as early as my concern of going to a CP school at Naz even though 3 siblings before me all had). I ultimately did explore all options and while a college degree has served me really well I can also say I didn't really know what I was doing or wanting to do even at 18 making those decisions. There's "not coddling" kids, but there's also just laying out options totally honestly and letting them learn and potentially fail a little too. Definite balance.

What could go wrong?

Equality of chance of winning a title is gonna be pretty hard to do without watering down certain classes.

Put another way, Benet doesn't look poised to be a very serious football team and Naz doesn't look poised to be a serious boys basketball team (and to be fair to Benet, Naz is much worse at bball that Benet is at football, they were just the first school i thought of as ESCC bball standard bearer).

That doesn't mean relative to their size, private status, and any other factors you want to consider (outside of just direct wins) that both shouldnt be measured/classified equally at both sports. It's okay that Naz doesn't have a shot at winning a basketball title (or even sectional - I think they maybe had one regional run maybe in past 20 years?). A regional title appearance is just a good season for them in the same way a quarterfinals appearance one a decade might be a good football season for others. It's not that Naz is incapable of doing better at boys basketball. They just haven't. Goes for every sport that way.

So if you can create a compelling regular season division for smaller schools / less accomplished schools that's probably about as good as you can hope. Because neither a split system or combined system likely means much come playoff time until the schools change something about the way they're doing it (if they even want to).
  • Like
Reactions: HotBeer

IHSA Adjusts Classification Cycle Board Meeting

Is Brother Rice and Marist still going to be 5/6A?
All.... The tenor of this latest announcement by the Ihsa in my opinion suggests they are going to look at just about everything once again. Which would include the waiver policy affecting the above mentioned schools. Will it be changed? The whining is pretty loud. Stay tuned... TRatsy

Multiplier/waiver

I agree with you Ramblinman I don’t like the complaining but as long as privates can recruit a 30 mile radius plublics will be at a slightly disadvantage. I am not saying a lot needs to be tweaked to make the playoffs better. Increase the multiplier a little maybe instead of 1.65 make it 2.00? I like the idea of any school public or private that’s wins state 2 years in a row gets bumped up a class. If they win the next year they get bumped up again. If they lose they drop a class.
The 30 mile radius would have to go if privates want to continue with mix playoffs.

Private Schools 7 - Public Schools 1. That’s a wrap!

I don't think either of us is arguing that the trades are for the cast off kids. What you are arguing for is what the current system is set up to do.
Our public education system wasn’t created to provide the highest level of academic achievement for every student, but rather to ensure that every student gets a basic education. The main goal is to teach the essential skills like reading, writing, basic math, and science. This helps students become responsible citizens and prepares them to be part of the workforce.
For students who are ready for more challenging academics, there are honors and AP courses. These classes offer harder content and help students get ready for college or specialized careers.
The main purpose of public schools is to make sure all students, no matter their background, have access to the basic knowledge they need to succeed in life.
A strong public education system is crucial for creating a capable workforce, which is important for the economy. Without it, we could end up with more low-skilled jobs (front-end manufacturing), which would hurt middle and lower-class families. Public education provides everyone with a basic level of knowledge that helps them succeed in the world, regardless of their family’s income.
In this way, public education helps make sure everyone has at least a basic understanding of important skills, helping to keep our economy strong and our society fair.
Sac’um,

If they are prepared for the workforce what work are they to do with the Basics? Basic math does not prepare you for College or really the trades as evidenced by the OP’s post about sitting for the apprentice test.

@snets,

I may have judged you a bit harsher than I should have as I thought you were joining yourself to Sac’ums comments which tend to IMHO poopoo the trades. I just want to see kids prepared for the world and this general basic education pushes kids through the system unprepared for said world. Apologies!

What could go wrong?

If you just want them to have a chance to win a playoff game or maybe two, then the NIPL will probably be too daunting and quite a bit more difficult than the current set up, and that goes against your championing of their cause.
Quite the contrary.

I want them to feel like they belong to an interscholastic athletic association where there is no double standard, where their success is rewarded and not discounted, and where they aren't treated as second class citizens. And, having them win a NIPL playoff game or two is basically a game or two more playoff games than they are winning now. Again, if you get all the private schools to join, it becomes easier for the small privates to win.

College Football New Playoff Format

High School football playoffs are over and the private/ public debate is tiring.

I hope therefore it's OK to talk about another playoff, College Football. It's the first one in the new format.

Hope it's OK with you Edgy? I want to talk more playoff football.

Do we have any IHSA players on these teams and what high school did they attend?

Who are you taking?

What is your upset pick?

Login to view embedded media
Esl has Patterson at smu, Lovett at UGA, and Spraggins at UT.

ND has a bunch of guys from the Chicagoland area.

Jeff Thorne-North Central

Great coach and, like ND's Hennesy, a profoundly decent man.

You can learn a lot about a coach and a man by observing his sideline demeanor, especially when a late call goes unfairly against him, costing his team a state championship.

Question: Can a ref reverse himself on the field when he knows he blew a call? Does he do the right thing, or does try to maintain an aura of authority?
What are you talking about brother

What could go wrong?

Oh please. They have little to no chance now, and much less if they are multiplied up to Peotone's and Manteno's class in the IHSA.
That’s kind of my point. None of the referenced schools have much chance of winning a title, the publics mentioned included. If you just want them to have a chance to win a playoff game or maybe two, then the NIPL will probably be too daunting and quite a bit more difficult than the current set up, and that goes against your championing of their cause.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT