The former Ohio State wide receiver announced Thursday that he is transferring to Iowa, choosing to become a Hawkeye just four days after he entered his name into the transfer portal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cade MacNamara is an upgrade over what they have had in recent years.Iowa puts a lot of players into the NFL.
They are just always missing a QB and a passing game.
TE's and LB's are golden there but they haven't had a dynamic playmaker at the skill positions in a long time. Marvin McNutt.....before him it think it was Tim Dwight! I'm sure I'm missing a few but speed wideouts have never been their game.Iowa puts a lot of players into the NFL.
They are just always missing a QB and a passing game.
No Iowa is a trash place for WRs due to a father being unable to see his kid is completely over matched. In the last 15 NFL drafts they have produced a 5th round and 6th round pick at WR and that’s it. Good luck to the kid but it’s a terrible choice based on their history of developing WRs.A receiver leaves Iowa to go play with his childhood friend QB at Purdue, so Iowa is a trash place for WRs? That sounds like a giant leap...one that I wouldn't make.
I don’t get the Mcnarama is going to change the offense. He was a QB for a very good running team now he’s going to Iowa LOL.I agree, he shouldn't be the offensive coordinator but I also think when they have a decent QB the offense is basically fine... both can be true.
I also think the majority of Big Ten schools don't develop highly drafted WRs, so if he wanted to play near home there's not a ton of options. The Illini, for example, have more than two WRs drafted in the last 15-20 years? I doubt it.
In the last 15 drafts IL has had 2 picks same as Iowa but they were 1st and 2nd picks so big difference.I agree, he shouldn't be the offensive coordinator but I also think when they have a decent QB the offense is basically fine... both can be true.
I also think the majority of Big Ten schools don't develop highly drafted WRs, so if he wanted to play near home there's not a ton of options. The Illini, for example, have more than two WRs drafted in the last 15-20 years? I doubt it.
It’ll be the same offense, the only difference is Iowa will be able to move the chains via pass from time to time and will be effective. The Defense was excellent last year.I don’t get the Mcnarama is going to change the offense. He was a QB for a very good running team now he’s going to Iowa LOL.
At the end of the day, Iowa got them a playmaker. There offense was suspect last year. KB and Mc will change the narrative.It’ll be the same offense, the only difference is Iowa will be able to move the chains via pass from time to time and will be effective. The Defense was excellent last year.
All they need is a QB to manage the game and keep Ds honest and Iowa wins B1G West, which is exactly what I think happens this season.
Goes back to my point that a playmaker had to leave that offense to become a playmaker.At the end of the day, Iowa got them a playmaker. There offense was suspect last year. KB and Mc will change the narrative.
So it went from 15-20 years to 10.Those two guys played for Ron Zook, correct? That means they have zero the past 10 years... so no, not seeing the big difference.
Quite a few things make me feel good. Moving the goalposts to fit a narrative doesn’t.They were never my goalposts. It was clownbaby who brought up the 15-20 year thing, not me (which I understand because Iowa has had the same coach). I made a point about the last 10 years... that was true.
Ron Zook has no bearing on the current program any more than Mike White does. But, hey, whatever makes you feel good.
he hasn’t quite figured that out yet.Are your comparing college programs, or coaches?
If they ever could land a 5 star QB they'd be something! Always have a solid OL, great TEs, and a stout defense.Iowa puts a lot of players into the NFL.
They are just always missing a QB and a passing game.