Monticello 8 v Montini 49 FINAL
- Edgy's Lost His Mind Free Football Board
- 48 Replies
YUP!!!!Khalfie from Turks?
YUP!!!!Khalfie from Turks?
Khalfie from Turks?That is hill-larry-us!
khalfie!
Oh this - this this - I was thinking this then I realized I - well still got nothinI thought this was going to be a support group thread ...
I’ve heard that it was a holdover from the districts thing that got voted in then rescinded. Not 100% sure though.I’ve read plenty of messages about people disagreeing with the 2 year enrollment process. What’s the reasoning behind it? Is it really that tedious to get yearly enrollment numbers?
because if you can't defend that, then the following touchdown is indefensible. simple if then, like i said.
Login to view embedded mediaWhat's funny about a man's love for option football!?
At least she won’t need to lug the cooler to the game tomorrow to keep the beers cold.I have some inside information
Batavia reached out to LWE and has a few surprises lined up for MC
Let’s just say the F-You lady and the horn sections seasons just got extended!!!
going for 3 for 3 and possibly 4 for 4 on blowouts from unmultiplied privates schools could end up having disastrous consequences on the setup most of us know and love, with one more private guaranteed to win and two others heavily favoredWhere is the outrage for the rest of the games with larger margins of victory?
What's funny about a man's love for option football!?Says Flexboner69!
you can see me complaining about it in another thread, thanks for asking. i'm pretty sure i said "it's an unmitigated disaster"Where is the outrage for the rest of the games with larger margins of victory?
Where is the outrage for the rest of the games with larger margins of victory?because if you can't defend that, then the following touchdown is indefensible. simple if then, like i said.
You can't be that bad at mathlmao the school's enrollment is what, 5% power 4 football players? sure rub lena's nose in it
You're wasting your logic and time.because if you can't defend that, then the following touchdown is indefensible. simple if then, like i said.
because if you can't defend that, then the following touchdown is indefensible. simple if then, like i said.Why do you keep bringing up then going for 2? Im not defending that.
It became eye opening to me after seeing the scores in the 1st 3 state games. Small privates out scoring their opponents by a combined 153-22.
with 1 exception.
Yeah I get it. Lotta mouths to feed. 😆Another view ... the sophomore QB is being recruited on both sides of the river and you want to keep him happy so he stays.
This is Fraizier's first four-year class. He inherited a crappy program and these kids turned it around.Yea I hate this crowd that comes out after a team is playing for state and up by, in their opinion, a big enough margin to let 2nd string guys in. If there is anyone the coach needs to do right by, it's the seniors that got him there. And he damn sure shouldn't be worried about how the other team feels.
lmao the school's enrollment is what, 5% power 4 football players? sure rub lena's nose in itI can get behind trying to break a record. That doesn’t explain the deep shot TD throw, but that kid is special and his name belongs in record books.
I will say that there was definitely a feeling that Althoff was trying to rub Lena’s nose in it. But it’s football and you play to the whistle and the final tick. My only concern would have been protecting Hill from a late shot or something because Althoff was definitely showboating and pissing them off.
Why do you keep bringing up then going for 2? Im not defending that.the "record chasing" was preceded by going for 2 to go to 50, and context is valuable. going for 2 at 48 is an indicator of poor sportmanship, which was followed by what you're defending. bit of an if/then here and taking a small logical leap to connect the two is all that's needed