LA vs. York
- Edgy's Lost His Mind Free Football Board
- 20 Replies
IYKYK.I'm not sure what this means but it sounded awesome
IYKYK.I'm not sure what this means but it sounded awesome
I'm not sure what this means but it sounded awesomeLet us remember that a game is made up of four quarters and also that four quarters make up a game. It is not right for some to only have games of three quarters or even two quarters, for that is not truly a game. Games of four quarters should not be reserved just for the privileged. We must unburden ourselves from this.
The problem is where they are trending.They are top 10 in scoring defense and yards/game. They are 11 in rushing yards allowed per game. A top 10 defense is what was expected and that's what they are.
Racki can win 100 state championships and I still will never understand nor forgive that punt. We were better off pulling a York and sprinting through the back of our own end zone.I was very confident going in but I’m not gonna lie I was incredibly nervous when Washington took back that kick. Naz needed that answer really bad.
Btw how on earth could Naz screw up and kick it to him? Flashbacks to Samson Evans circa 2017.
@Wittymoniker1 is one of the most chill people on this forum, and you're giving him shit? I don't read everything here, but I don't think I've ever seen negative words from him. Enjoy the victory and move on.Compared to some other schools I know, I don't rejoice in a Rita loss or get dejected when she wins. On the other hand, expressing satisfaction in a sweet win by your preferred team seems to be allowed on this site. Everyone is a homer here, though some of us are more enthusiastic than others. When I write a comment, I do it to please myself, not to add some vinegar to your cup of bitter tears.
Wins and losses are what come first. And points scored and given up are what most directly lead to wins and losses. I don't care if the Bears give up yards as long as it isn't leading to a lot of points scored. And at this point in the season it hasn't.They are not the defense we thought they would be. It’s disappointing that we can’t stop the run until the red zone. We don’t put enough pressure on the QB when we know it’s a pass play. The defense needs an identity. Eberfool can’t motivate players. I am sure this has something to do with the lack of focus.
That is exactly it. No matter how good a defense is they are going to have some bad games. It's a long season and a short one at the same time. But if it wasn't for this defense the Bears might not have two wins.I was disappointed in the D on Sunday, not their best performance, but overall can’t complain.
The SF play where the entire OL shifts…they did it a few times. Naz jumped on o e and was called for offsides, the other time it was a bad snap and a sack, not sure what happened the 3rd time.From my experience teams that run all those trick plays realizes that they are out matched and need to find momentum in other ways. They ran them Week 9 and it worked out for them, this time it did not. If both teams played straight up, I think Naz wins 9 out of 10 times. Both teams are overly talented, but SF is young playing a group of 6 starters that have 3 years of Varsity experience. Seniors' vs inexperienced players, leads to more victories this time of the year.
They are top 10 in scoring defense and yards/game. They are 11 in rushing yards allowed per game. A top 10 defense is what was expected and that's what they are.They are not the defense we thought they would be. It’s disappointing that we can’t stop the run until the red zone. We don’t put enough pressure on the QB when we know it’s a pass play. The defense needs an identity. Eberfool can’t motivate players. I am sure this has something to do with the lack of focus.
1 - Chicago (Sullivan) vs. 32 - Chicago (Noble/Bulls) |
2 - Breese (Central) vs. 31 -Harrisburg |
3 - Chicago (South Shore) vs. 30 - Chicago (Senn) |
4 - Waterloo (H.S.) vs. 29 - Decatur (St. Teresa) |
5 - Chicago (Marshall) [Coop] vs. 28 - Chicago (Goode) |
6 - Palos Heights (Chicago Christian) vs. 27 - Taylorville |
7 - Chicago (North Lawndale Charter) vs. 26 - Marengo |
8 - Richmond (R.-Burton) vs. 25 - Chicago (C. Hope Academy) |
9 - Mahomet (Seymour) vs. 24 - Sandwich |
10 - Chicago (Agricultural Science) vs. 23 - Chicago (Curie) |
11 - Chicago (Simeon) vs. 22 - Jacksonville (H.S.) |
12 - Woodstock (North) vs. 21 - Mt. Zion |
13 - Roxana vs. 20 - Chicago (Clemente) |
14 - Highland vs. 19 - Johnsburg |
15 - Chicago (Corliss) [Coop] vs. 18 - Chicago (Prosser) |
16 - Columbia vs. 17 - Chicago (Mather) |
1 - Byron vs. 32 - West Frankfort (Frankfort) |
2 - St. Joseph (Ogden) vs. 31 -Aurora (Christian) |
3 - Wilmington vs. 30 - Mt. Carmel |
4 - Olney (Richland County) vs. 29 - Fairbury (Prairie Central) |
5 - Dixon (H.S.) vs. 28 - Stillman Valley |
6 - Princeton vs. 27 - Bloomington (Central Catholic) |
7 - Monmouth (M.-Roseville) vs. 26 - Genoa (G.-Kingston) |
8 - Nashville vs. 25 - Oregon |
9 - West Chicago (Wheaton Academy) vs. 24 - Virden (North Mac) |
10 - Pana (H.S.) vs. 23 - Rockford (Lutheran) |
11 - Vandalia vs. 22 - Paxton (Buckley-Loda) |
12 - Chicago (Kennedy) vs. 21 - DuQuoin (H.S.) |
13 - Carterville vs. 20 - Peotone |
14 - Monticello vs. 19 - Benton |
15 - Manteno vs. 18 - Tolono (Unity) |
16 - Coal City vs. 17 - Murphysboro |
1 - Farmington vs. 32 - Dupo |
2 - Johnston City vs. 31 -Mackinaw (Deer Creek) |
3 - Williamsville vs. 30 - Kewanee (H.S.) |
4 - Downs (Tri-Valley) vs. 29 - Red Bud |
5 - Maroa (M.-Forsyth) vs. 28 - Erie [E.-Prophetstown Coop] |
6 - Greenville vs. 27 - Carlinville |
7 - Elmwood [E.-Brimfield Coop] vs. 26 - Clifton (Central) |
8 - Casey (Westfield) vs. 25 - Ottawa (Marquette) |
9 - Chester vs. 24 - Dwight [Dwight/Gardner-So. Wilmington Coop] |
10 - Eureka vs. 23 - Stanford (Olympia) |
11 - Seneca vs. 22 - Fairfield |
12 - Sterling (Newman Central Catholic) vs. 21 - Flora |
13 - Taylor Ridge (Rockridge) vs. 20 - Carthage (Illini West) |
14 - Sesser (Valier) [Coop] vs. 19 - Shelbyville |
15 - Carmi (White County) vs. 18 - El Paso (Gridley) |
16 - New Berlin [Coop] vs. 17 - Macomb |
1 - LeRoy vs. 32 - Moweaqua (Central A & M) |
2 - Lena (L.-Winslow) vs. 31 -Nokomis |
3 - Sullivan [Sullivan-Okaw Valley Coop] vs. 30 - Catlin (Salt Fork) |
4 - Bismarck (B.-Henning-Rossville-Alvin) vs. 29 - Fithian (Oakwood) |
5 - Pecatonica [Du-Pec Coop] vs. 28 - Galena (H.S.) |
6 - Hardin (Calhoun) [Coop] vs. 27 - Jacksonville (Routt) [Coop] |
7 - Camp Point (Central) vs. 26 - Mt. Sterling (Brown County) |
8 - Arthur (A.-Lovington-Atwood-Hammond) vs. 25 - Tuscola |
9 - Gibson City (Melvin-Sibley) vs. 24 - Bridgeport (Red Hill) |
10 - Momence vs. 23 - Stockton |
11 - Rushville (R.-Industry) vs. 22 - Niantic (Sangamon Valley) [Coop] |
12 - Toulon (Stark County) vs. 21 - Westville |
13 - Lanark (Eastland) [Eastland-Pearl City Coop] vs. 20 - Carrollton |
14 - Greenfield [G.-Northwestern Coop] vs. 19 - Winchester [West Central Coop] |
15 - Toledo (Cumberland) vs. 18 - Kewanee (Wethersfield) [Annawan-Wethersfield Coop] |
16 - Warrensburg (W.-Latham) vs. 17 - Princeville |
Class | Current Range | FE Range |
1A | (0 - 292.5) | (220 - 325) |
2A | (296.5 - 403.5) | (325 - 436) |
3A | (406.5 - 542.5) | (439 - 580) |
4A | (553 - 844) | (581 - 997) |
5A | (848 - 1,272.5), | (1,017 - 1,373) |
6A | (1,723 - 1,802) | (1,377 - 1,666) |
7A | (1,604 - 2,156) | (1,666 - 2,173) |
8A | (2,190 +) | (2,190 +) |
From my experience teams that run all those trick plays realizes that they are out matched and need to find momentum in other ways. They ran them Week 9 and it worked out for them, this time it did not. If both teams played straight up, I think Naz wins 9 out of 10 times. Both teams are overly talented, but SF is young playing a group of 6 starters that have 3 years of Varsity experience. Seniors' vs inexperienced players, leads to more victories this time of the year.I was very confident going in but I’m not gonna lie I was incredibly nervous when Washington took back that kick. Naz needed that answer really bad.
Btw how on earth could Naz screw up and kick it to him? Flashbacks to Samson Evans circa 2017.
Don't lie. You very much intended to do it.