Rice vs Marist
- Thread starter feeto
- Start date
Their lack of scoring points!!
Agreed.
I don't know how many possesions Rice had in that game, but it was a ton. Their defense shut down MS the entire game. For Rice to only score 1 TD should be a concern to the Crazies.
Same for Marist. Tons of possesions, and only 1 score. Plus their kicker had a rough night.
They had a 14-play drive lasting 8 minutes to start the 2nd half. They ran 2x as many plays (33 to 16) as MS did in the 2nd half - a program known for scoring a lot of points. I’d don’t think they took one shot downfield in the 2nd half. Just wanted to move the chains.
Do you think, perhaps, the strategy was to keep the MS offense off the field and milk the clock?
Also, I’d say the MS defense is pretty good. Every BR yard was earned.
The goal is to win the game. Whether it’s 10-7 or 36-33.
The offense will be fine but the days of BR trying to win with just a high-scoring offense are over. It’s clear there is a different style of play under this coach.
When will Marist turn loose its two sophomore stud WR's, 6'3" and 6'6"? I don't think either one saw a down last week at GBW. No one has seen these kids play unless they went to a freshman game last year. They will be game changers at the season end like Carnell Tate was for Marist years ago.
Last edited:
OK..... If you're happy with 1 touchdown per game, enjoy.
Seriously, you're not worried about the lack of offense? You just said they had 33 plays in the second half.....none of them resulted in a TD.
Preferably week 3.
They were mostly running plays between the tackles designed to get 3-4-5 yards and let the clock run. And even with MS stacking the box they were moving the chains. They didn’t take any risks after going up 10-7. I think they called the game based on the situation. Why give the MS offense a short field? Especially after 2 turnovers near midfield in the 1st half.
If MS was scoring more points, I’m sure different plays would have been called. I’m not sure what’s difficult to understand about that.
I’m happy with BR beating MS. And I very much enjoyed BR’s strategy for week one.
I don’t understand why he hasn’t just picked between one of them and stuck with it. This back and forth between the two has been going on since he took over. From what I’ve seen Brown is the clearly better athlete. The knock is his throwing and his inability to stay healthy after the hits but if your going to play the kill the clock game and run it and win with D then he should be the man. Neither are going to get in a groove with this back and forth. Hartz had a lot more chances last year it seems but they went 5-4.
I’ll take BR + 7.5 all day and thank you kindly for it!
Saying those two will be game changers like Carnell Tate is a stretch , kid will be playing on Sundays
Game changers at the high school level. Not saying either of them going to the league. Plenty of guys were game changers at the HS level and never panned out after that.
Checked and didn’t see anything. If you have a link you can drop I’d greatly appreciate it.
Sounds like the Hawks found their offense.
Nice comeback for BR. Better win for Marist. And a whole lot of “what just happened?”
Not what I expected from a type of game standpoint but that’s HS football for you.
Not what I expected from a type of game standpoint but that’s HS football for you.
It’s time for Rice to end the two qb charade, it is just embarrassing at this point.
Agreed. I think there’s a clear QB1 after tonight.
Anyone know why some schools these 2 for sure take the games off YouTube afterwards? Except rice win over mc in the playoffs, that one they've kept up.
This was a fantastic game that marist won and they take it down. Not everyone has the ability to watch live. Seems like such a disservice to the fans and I don't get the angle.
They really think future opponents are gonna get some huge advantage seeing the game on YouTube as opposed to the regular film.
This was a fantastic game that marist won and they take it down. Not everyone has the ability to watch live. Seems like such a disservice to the fans and I don't get the angle.
They really think future opponents are gonna get some huge advantage seeing the game on YouTube as opposed to the regular film.
The logic given last time this question was asked was so opposing teams would not have access to game film which doesn’t make much sense because they already have it. And of course they left up that quarter final victory vs. MC. They couldn’t talk about the season ending loss vs. Wheaton North so beating MC twice in one season became the hi-light of the ‘21 season in crusader land.
