ADVERTISEMENT

PROVIDENCE @ ST FRANCIS - Factual Read

Nevada Dude

Well-Known Member
May 18, 2022
309
295
63
I would like to upload the videos as part of this thread, but I unfortunately need some help. The video's are important to what I'm saying below so any help would be appreciated. Feel free to message me and tell me how.

I am starting this on a new thread because what’s included on this new thread is important and I don’t want it to get lost in the other thread, which is become a bit “off the rails”.

First and foremost, the Providence (“PC”)/St. Francis (“STF”) game was a very good game, and I think everyone needs to understand that fact. The players and coaches deserve better than this!

I had the good fortune to be on the sidelines for STF when all of this went down. I have good friends that are GREAT Coaches and better people at STF and I’m putting this on its own thread because it’s just that important.

I’m trying to included the video of the kneel-down for everyone’s reference. Watch it and you will agree that the young man at STF did absolutely nothing wrong, nor did anyone else on either side.

Facts are as follows:
  • Game was played at STF
  • 50 Seconds remained in the game
  • STF has the ball 1st and 10 at the PC 42 yard line
  • PC has two timeouts
  • The entire video clip is 29 seconds (+/-). .
  • At the 8 second mark, the Head Official can be seen signaling the start of the play clock
  • STF takes a knee at the 28 second mark.
  • Obviously, there is no play clock violation at 25 seconds (which is the change of possession play clock).
  • 2.2 seconds ran off the clock on 1st down when STF took a knee.
  • I think all who view the video will agree that the kneel-down was without issue.
  • PC made NO CONTACT with any STF Player.
What happened:
  • A flag was thrown against STF for “delay of game” and the clock was stopped by the Head Official.
  • STF was penalized 5 yards with a loss of down.
  • The Clock will NOT start again until the ball is snapped, WITHOUT PC calling a timeout.
  • STF was not made aware that they lost the down and took another knee.
    • The scoreboard read 1st down (see video)
    • The chains read 1st down until (see video)
    • both teams aligned to start the play
    • the Sideline Judge walks toward the “stick” on PC’s sideline and makes a motion to the chain-gang, and..
    • down is changed to 2nd on the chains just prior to the snap.
  • PC, again, makes no contact…why? They all thought it was 1st down again as well.
  • PC calls “Time Out” and has one time-out remaining
  • This 1st/2nd down, which was a kneel-down which took 2.8 seconds off the clock after the officials made the clock operator reset the clock from 42 seconds.
NOTE: BY THE OFFICIAL’S OWN ADMISSION AND INSTRUCTION TO THE CLOCK OPERATOR, THIS 2ND KNEEL DOWN TOOK LONGER THAT THE 1ST KNEEL DOWN, FOR WHICH STF WAS PENALIZED!
  • When STF inquired about the down, The Head Official (to Paraphrase) stated “I told Providence you were taking a knee so they wouldn’t hit, but your guy took too long to take the knee, so I penalized you for a delay of game and took the down away from you”. This can be verified by anyone on the STF sideline and was overheard by many. I heard the coaches stating this after the game as well.
  • 3rd down (which should be 2nd down), STF is forced to run a play, and NOT kneel-down to now try to gain a 1st down. They gain a few yards and now it’s full-on contact by PC.
  • Providence calls their last time out.
  • There remains 38.2 seconds left in the game.
NOTE: THAT MEANS STF RAN THREE PLAYS IN 11.8 SECONDS WHILE PROVIDENCE HAD ONLY TWO TIME OUTS.

STF is forced to punt, and Providence eventually gets awarded a touchdown to win on the final play of the game, despite the ball being on the ground and visible to all in attendance.​

Bottom Line:

  • STF should have been able to run out the clock, if not for the Head Official making up his own rules DURING a football game.
  • If not for the penalty, STF would’ve followed the following script, which is exactly what you should do with the clock starting at 50 seconds on the 1st down snap:
  • 1st and 2nd downs – kneel downs – 44..0 seconds remain on the play clock after down Providence used both time outs.
  • 3rd down – kneel down or short running play. Clock will run down until 3-5 seconds remaining depending on how long it takes the ref to set the ball and STF uses a time out and expends another second of clock time and takes the penalty. Let’s say 4 seconds remain
  • 4th down – STF can do ANY of the following
    • runs backwards and takes a knee as the clock expires
    • running play which will burn the time off the clock
    • punts the ball out of bounds
NOTE: ALL OF THIS IS ONLY IF PROVIDENCE IS COMING AFTER YOU ON 1ST AND 2ND DOWNS, WHICH THEY WERENT. PROVIDENCE HAD CONCEEDED THE GAME UNTIL THEY REALIZED WHAT THE OFFICIAL DID. IT WAS NOW 3RD DOWN, WHICH IS THE SAME TIME EVERYONE ELSE REALIZED. NOW THE KIDS ON PROVIDENCE ACTUALLY SNAPPED THEIR CHIN STRAPS ON.


Please, someone, answer me this:

  • HOW CAN OFFICIAL THROW A FLAG ON A TEAM FOR DELAY OF GAME, WHEN THERE IS NO DELAY?
  • WHY WOULD AN OFFICIAL TELL PROVIDENCE THAT STF WAS TAKING A KNEE AND NOT TO MAKE CONTACT? THIS I GET, BUT THIS BECAME THE ISSUE WITH WHAT THE HEAD OFFICIAL INTERPRETED AND WHY HE MADE UP HIS OWN RULES.
  • A DELAY OF GAME PENALTY DOES NOT CARRY A LOSS OF DOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE ONLY A FEW WAYS A TEAM CAN LOSE A DOWN VIA A PENALTY. DELAY OF GAME IS NOT ONE OF THEM…NOR IS OFFSIDES.
  • CAN A GAME OFFICIAL SIMPLY PENALIZE A TEAM BY TAKING AWAY A DOWN? DO THE RULES GIVE THEM THAT ABILITY? THIS IS A VERY SERIOUS QUESTION!!
  • SHOULD OFFICIALS THAT DO THIS BE ALLOWED TO OFFICIATE A GAME AGAIN? IS THERE NO PENALTY? IS THERE EVER ANY ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THESE OFFICIALS THAT MAKE HUGE ERRORS OR MISTAKES WITH “INTENT” LIKE THIS?
Last - Wouldn't it be nice to see someone in this sport do the right thing. Providence, through divine intervention, was awarded a win when it was a loss ...on so many levels. No way the HC at Providence would ever do the right thing. This guy knows and unfortunately, without his acknowledgement, the IHSA most likely wont do anything about this.

If nothing else, get rid of that officiating crew!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: UAGoofy and k1867
I don't think the video is up anymore. I have moved on, the refs completely bungled this on many fronts...nothing can be done now.
The one that gets me was the loss of down on delay of game. Gotta add that to the “never seen that before,” file.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gestalt45
I am a bit surprised that a ref would tell the defense to not make contact in that situation, when SF was taking a knee. Not saying that it didn't happen though. I was in a similar situation, with my team clearly taking a knee. The defense played it full go, & I asked the ref why he let that happen. He stated that as long as the score was within 8 points (a one score game), they had to allow the defense an opportunity to force a turnover. Once he explained it that way, it made sense, & we adjusted accordingly.
 
I would like to upload the videos as part of this thread, but I unfortunately need some help. The video's are important to what I'm saying below so any help would be appreciated. Feel free to message me and tell me how.

I am starting this on a new thread because what’s included on this new thread is important and I don’t want it to get lost in the other thread, which is become a bit “off the rails”.

First and foremost, the Providence (“PC”)/St. Francis (“STF”) game was a very good game, and I think everyone needs to understand that fact. The players and coaches deserve better than this!

I had the good fortune to be on the sidelines for STF when all of this went down. I have good friends that are GREAT Coaches and better people at STF and I’m putting this on its own thread because it’s just that important.

I’m trying to included the video of the kneel-down for everyone’s reference. Watch it and you will agree that the young man at STF did absolutely nothing wrong, nor did anyone else on either side.

Facts are as follows:
  • Game was played at STF
  • 50 Seconds remained in the game
  • STF has the ball 1st and 10 at the PC 42 yard line
  • PC has two timeouts
  • The entire video clip is 29 seconds (+/-). .
  • At the 8 second mark, the Head Official can be seen signaling the start of the play clock
  • STF takes a knee at the 28 second mark.
  • Obviously, there is no play clock violation at 25 seconds (which is the change of possession play clock).
  • 2.2 seconds ran off the clock on 1st down when STF took a knee.
  • I think all who view the video will agree that the kneel-down was without issue.
  • PC made NO CONTACT with any STF Player.
What happened:
  • A flag was thrown against STF for “delay of game” and the clock was stopped by the Head Official.
  • STF was penalized 5 yards with a loss of down.
  • The Clock will NOT start again until the ball is snapped, WITHOUT PC calling a timeout.
  • STF was not made aware that they lost the down and took another knee.
    • The scoreboard read 1st down (see video)
    • The chains read 1st down until (see video)
    • both teams aligned to start the play
    • the Sideline Judge walks toward the “stick” on PC’s sideline and makes a motion to the chain-gang, and..
    • down is changed to 2nd on the chains just prior to the snap.
  • PC, again, makes no contact…why? They all thought it was 1st down again as well.
  • PC calls “Time Out” and has one time-out remaining
  • This 1st/2nd down, which was a kneel-down which took 2.8 seconds off the clock after the officials made the clock operator reset the clock from 42 seconds.
NOTE: BY THE OFFICIAL’S OWN ADMISSION AND INSTRUCTION TO THE CLOCK OPERATOR, THIS 2ND KNEEL DOWN TOOK LONGER THAT THE 1ST KNEEL DOWN, FOR WHICH STF WAS PENALIZED!
  • When STF inquired about the down, The Head Official (to Paraphrase) stated “I told Providence you were taking a knee so they wouldn’t hit, but your guy took too long to take the knee, so I penalized you for a delay of game and took the down away from you”. This can be verified by anyone on the STF sideline and was overheard by many. I heard the coaches stating this after the game as well.
  • 3rd down (which should be 2nd down), STF is forced to run a play, and NOT kneel-down to now try to gain a 1st down. They gain a few yards and now it’s full-on contact by PC.
  • Providence calls their last time out.
  • There remains 38.2 seconds left in the game.
NOTE: THAT MEANS STF RAN THREE PLAYS IN 11.8 SECONDS WHILE PROVIDENCE HAD ONLY TWO TIME OUTS.

STF is forced to punt, and Providence eventually gets awarded a touchdown to win on the final play of the game, despite the ball being on the ground and visible to all in attendance.​

Bottom Line:

  • STF should have been able to run out the clock, if not for the Head Official making up his own rules DURING a football game.
  • If not for the penalty, STF would’ve followed the following script, which is exactly what you should do with the clock starting at 50 seconds on the 1st down snap:
  • 1st and 2nd downs – kneel downs – 44..0 seconds remain on the play clock after down Providence used both time outs.
  • 3rd down – kneel down or short running play. Clock will run down until 3-5 seconds remaining depending on how long it takes the ref to set the ball and STF uses a time out and expends another second of clock time and takes the penalty. Let’s say 4 seconds remain
  • 4th down – STF can do ANY of the following
    • runs backwards and takes a knee as the clock expires
    • running play which will burn the time off the clock
    • punts the ball out of bounds
NOTE: ALL OF THIS IS ONLY IF PROVIDENCE IS COMING AFTER YOU ON 1ST AND 2ND DOWNS, WHICH THEY WERENT. PROVIDENCE HAD CONCEEDED THE GAME UNTIL THEY REALIZED WHAT THE OFFICIAL DID. IT WAS NOW 3RD DOWN, WHICH IS THE SAME TIME EVERYONE ELSE REALIZED. NOW THE KIDS ON PROVIDENCE ACTUALLY SNAPPED THEIR CHIN STRAPS ON.


Please, someone, answer me this:

  • HOW CAN OFFICIAL THROW A FLAG ON A TEAM FOR DELAY OF GAME, WHEN THERE IS NO DELAY?
  • WHY WOULD AN OFFICIAL TELL PROVIDENCE THAT STF WAS TAKING A KNEE AND NOT TO MAKE CONTACT? THIS I GET, BUT THIS BECAME THE ISSUE WITH WHAT THE HEAD OFFICIAL INTERPRETED AND WHY HE MADE UP HIS OWN RULES.
  • A DELAY OF GAME PENALTY DOES NOT CARRY A LOSS OF DOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE ONLY A FEW WAYS A TEAM CAN LOSE A DOWN VIA A PENALTY. DELAY OF GAME IS NOT ONE OF THEM…NOR IS OFFSIDES.
  • CAN A GAME OFFICIAL SIMPLY PENALIZE A TEAM BY TAKING AWAY A DOWN? DO THE RULES GIVE THEM THAT ABILITY? THIS IS A VERY SERIOUS QUESTION!!
  • SHOULD OFFICIALS THAT DO THIS BE ALLOWED TO OFFICIATE A GAME AGAIN? IS THERE NO PENALTY? IS THERE EVER ANY ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THESE OFFICIALS THAT MAKE HUGE ERRORS OR MISTAKES WITH “INTENT” LIKE THIS?
Last - Wouldn't it be nice to see someone in this sport do the right thing. Providence, through divine intervention, was awarded a win when it was a loss ...on so many levels. No way the HC at Providence would ever do the right thing. This guy knows and unfortunately, without his acknowledgement, the IHSA most likely wont do anything about this.

If nothing else, get rid of that officiating crew!
Tell me you are a lawyer without telling me you are a lawyer......
 
The one that gets me was the loss of down on delay of game. Gotta add that to the “never seen that before,” file.
It’s been said before but you can’t allow time to run off the clock and redo the down here.

St Francis could have done this numerous times and ran out the clock and it would still be 1st down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gestalt45
All I want to know is what does the IHSA say is the official ruling here. Did the refs make the right call or not so every coach can tell their players how to handle “taking a knee” situations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alexander32
I just don't get how everyone is all "the refs don't make mistakes, you lost the game yourself" until it's their team then we get whole threads about one play and lawyers getting involved.

When it's other teams they're just poorly coached and undisciplined who despite being "physically better" can't seem to stop holding and inversely never get held. And how can you tell they're undisciplined? By the zip code, silly.

Over it already, it's a L. Learn from it and move on.
 
It’s been said before but you can’t allow time to run off the clock and redo the down here.

St Francis could have done this numerous times and ran out the clock and it would still be 1st down.
But "delay of game" for this is not an NFHS penalty.
In all honesty a simple "hey you need to take an immediate knee, after 1st down play" would have been sufficient, no? It was clear SF QB was not trying to milk the clock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pjjp and gobears25
All I want to know is what does the IHSA say is the official ruling here. Did the refs make the right call or not so every coach can tell their players how to handle “taking a knee” situations.
I do hope a memo is sent out to all refs/AD(s) on how to handle this situation, so there is total clarity. Would hate to see this in a playoff game.
 
Instead of complaining on this message board who can do absolutely nothing, call Fenwick and get the name of the lawyer who tried to sue in 2016. Its also not going to work but, hey, SF parents got $. They can teach their kids that when things don't work out for you, just sue someone.
 
I just don't get how everyone is all "the refs don't make mistakes, you lost the game yourself" until it's their team then we get whole threads about one play and lawyers getting involved.

When it's other teams they're just poorly coached and undisciplined who despite being "physically better" can't seem to stop holding and inversely never get held. And how can you tell they're undisciplined? By the zip code, silly.

Over it already, it's a L. Learn from it and move on.
What if it is 99 zip codes?
 
It’s been said before but you can’t allow time to run off the clock and redo the down here.

St Francis could have done this numerous times and ran out the clock and it would still be 1st down.
In the final two minutes of a game the offended team can choose to start the clock on the ready for play or on the snap. If that option wasn’t provided then that’s also on the officials.

There is no loss of down on delay of game penalties- what will change is the play clock will go from 40 to 25 which would make it harder for them. Also see rule above
 
  • Like
Reactions: SiuCubFan8
I am a bit surprised that a ref would tell the defense to not make contact in that situation, when SF was taking a knee. Not saying that it didn't happen though. I was in a similar situation, with my team clearly taking a knee. The defense played it full go, & I asked the ref why he let that happen. He stated that as long as the score was within 8 points (a one score game), they had to allow the defense an opportunity to force a turnover. Once he explained it that way, it made sense, & we adjusted accordingly.
Former ref here- when offense taking a knee- we were instructed to tell the offense to protect themselves and tell the defense NOT to fire out.
 
I just don't get how everyone is all "the refs don't make mistakes, you lost the game yourself" until it's their team then we get whole threads about one play and lawyers getting involved.
Lawyers getting involved??? Come on Bones, I read both threads and there wasn't talk of getting lawyers involved other than the one mocking post in this thread.
 
Lawyers getting involved??? Come on Bones, I read both threads and there wasn't talk of getting lawyers involved other than the one mocking post in this thread.
I'm exaggerating, a little. But the point still stands. I view this like an ULC that was called but questionable... 💩 happens
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT