ADVERTISEMENT

Possible overturn of districts?

I predict it will be overturned by a slim margin. The travel times for some schools alone would/should enough of a difference. If only football schools vote and co-ops only get one vote the margin of vote will be slightly higher.
 
Districts cause more problems then they solve.

maybe along the lines of districts, they should put teams into competitive classed districts. so the noncompetive teams can actually learn more playing against like competition.
 
Worst kept secret around. There are a couple of proposals bouncing around.
 
maybe along the lines of districts, they should put teams into competitive classed districts. so the noncompetive teams can actually learn more playing against like competition.

The regular season determines who makes the playoffs... do the winners of the weak “competitive districts” get to make the playoffs at the expense of a team in the middle or bottom of the pack of a strong “competitive district?” Especially assuming these “competitive districts” mix class sizes... what if you are a 4A team with 6-7-8a teams compared to an 8a team with a bunch of 5-6a teams.... same problem as before in my book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gene K.
The regular season determines who makes the playoffs... do the winners of the weak “competitive districts” get to make the playoffs at the expense of a team in the middle or bottom of the pack of a strong “competitive district?” Especially assuming these “competitive districts” mix class sizes... what if you are a 4A team with 6-7-8a teams compared to an 8a team with a bunch of 5-6a teams.... same problem as before in my book.

have you never heard "A", "B", "C", and "D" divisions?? you obviously have been around for awhile. and every sport has them from youth programs up to the professional levels. it is a concept that started 100's of years ago. it has been proven to work for those 100's of years.
it creates better competition on ALL levels.
you have some sort of infatuation about class size. there are teams on a nightly basis that beat teams from all class sizes. I do not care how many kids you have in the school. if you have a good program, you want to play better competition each week to make your programs(kids) better.
and each division would be able to accomplish that goal by playing like minded programs.
it will also stop the teams from being beat on consistent basis by 40 or 50pts, the only thing that provides is an avenue for players to get worked up and try to hurt other players.
and if you are not strong enough to compete with bigger stronger teams you would not be in that division. my point, is the fact that teams are able to pad their stats with weak competition and beat the daylights out of a team does not mean you are good. you make it into the playoffs and get beat 50-0 in the first playoff game. but hey we made it into the playoffs whoohoo. now you would get the chance to not only make into the playoffs but strive and play meaningful games. there is thing we called healthy competition and then there is not so healthy competition.
every single conference has class size deficiencies they play 4a, 5a,6a, 7a, and 8a teams each week.
 
Last edited:
have you never heard "A", "B", "C", and "D" divisions?? you obviously have been around for awhile. and every sport has them from youth programs up to the professional levels. it is a concept that started 100's of years ago. it has been proven to work for those 100's of years.
it creates better competition on ALL levels.
you have some sort of infatuation about class size. there are teams on a nightly basis that beat teams from all class sizes. I do not care how many kids you have in the school. if you have a good program, you want to play better competition each week to make your programs(kids) better.
and each division would be able to accomplish that goal by playing like minded programs.
it will also stop the teams from being beat on consistent basis by 40 or 50pts, the only thing that provides is an avenue for players to get worked up and try to hurt other players.
and if you are not strong enough to compete with bigger stronger teams you would not be in that division. my point, is the fact that teams are able to pad their stats with weak competition and beat the daylights out of a team does not mean you are good. you make it into the playoffs and get beat 50-0 in the first playoff game. but hey we made it into the playoffs whoohoo. now you would get the chance to not only make into the playoffs but strive and play meaningful games.
every single conference has class size deficiencies they play 4a, 5a,6a, 7a, and 8a teams each week.

A lot to cover and clarify here... so are you suggesting that the A/B/C.... levels also apply to the playoffs (class sizes are totally done away with)? So you have an A state champ and a D state champ etc? If so, that’s the most “let’s get everyone a trophy” thing i’ve ever heard at the high school level... this isn’t youth sports where it may make sense to have a gold division champion and a silver division champion of a tournament.

A few examples about class... look at Aurora Christian, a one time juggernaut in 3a. They then joined the catholic league and had to play the likes of st Rita, brother rice, among others on their schedule and they went on a run of not making the playoffs at all but most felt if they could have gotten to 5 wins they would have still been capable of a deep run in the 3a playoffs. Conversely was it fair some of these bigger schools were racking up wins to help them qualify for the large school playoffs off the back of small schools like aurora Christian or others?

Yes any given smaller school may be able to beat larger schools on any given night in any given season but that’s a lot different than beating the top schools of a significantly larger school consistently or at playoff time. Nazareth has been to the last 2 state title games in 6/7a but lost handily both years to Marist who didn’t win 8a either year. Now this year may end up different but which is the outlier? Do you honestly think ICCP would hold up against the top teams in 6/7/8a week in and week out? Some may think so on this board, but they’d be wrong. Doesn’t mean iccp can’t beat a given 7a team here and there but not consistently against the good ones.

Classes exist for a reason because in every state over the course of history people recognize size matters. Where at the college and pro level are you saying abcd levels exist? College sizes don’t matter because the playing field is leveled not based on enrollment but number of scholarships that can be given.... thus FBS, FCS, D2, D3... within each division all schools get the same number of scholarships and rosters are capped at the same size. At the professional level again everything possible is done to make it a level field.... roster caps, salary caps, worst teams draft first to improve rosters, etc. None of these things apply to HS sports thus enrollment size classes.

Districts aren’t perfect due to geographic difficulties for some schools in some classes like the large schools in southern Illinois being a long ways from other big schools in the north, or loss of some rivalries, etc. But the general idea is good.... teams should qualify for their classes playoff by earning qualification via playing like size schools during the season to prove their worthiness in that class.
 
Last edited:
A lot to cover and clarify here... so are you suggesting that the A/B/C.... levels also apply to the playoffs (class sizes are totally done away with)? So you have an A state champ and a D state champ etc? If so, that’s the most “let’s get everyone a trophy” thing i’ve ever heard at the high school level... this isn’t youth sports where it may make sense to have a gold division champion and a silver division champion of a tournament.

A few examples about class... look at Aurora Christian, a one time juggernaut in 3a. They then joined the catholic league and had to play the likes of st Rita, brother rice, among others on their schedule and they went on a run of not making the playoffs at all but most felt if they could have gotten to 5 wins they would have still been capable of a deep run in the 3a playoffs. Conversely was it fair some of these bigger schools were racking up wins to help them qualify for the large school playoffs off the back of small schools like aurora Christian or others?

Yes any given smaller school may be able to beat larger schools on any given night in any given season but that’s a lot different than beating the top schools of a significantly larger school consistently or at playoff time. Nazareth has been to the last 2 state title games in 6/7a but lost handily both years to Marist who didn’t win 8a either year. Now this year may end up different but which is the outlier? Do you honestly think ICCP would hold up against the top teams in 6/7/8a week in and week out? Some may think so on this board, but they’d be wrong. Doesn’t mean iccp can’t beat a given 7a team here and there but not consistently against the good ones.

Classes exist for a reason because in every state over the course of history people recognize size matters. Where at the college and pro level are you saying abcd levels exist? College sizes don’t matter because the playing field is leveled not based on enrollment but number of scholarships that can be given.... thus FBS, FCS, D2, D3... within each division all schools get the same number of scholarships and rosters are capped at the same size. At the professional level again everything possible is done to make it a level field.... roster caps, salary caps, worst teams draft first to improve rosters, etc. None of these things apply to HS sports thus enrollment size classes.

Districts aren’t perfect due to geographic difficulties for some schools in some classes like the large schools in southern Illinois being a long ways from other big schools in the north, or loss of some rivalries, etc. But the general idea is good.... teams should qualify for their classes playoff by earning qualification via playing like size schools during the season to prove their worthiness in that class.

you have 8classes right now. that is the most give everyone a trophy concept out there. and yes, the reason colleges have all those different classifications simply because you have kids that are not that good enough to make it at a top school or grades levels to make into big school, whatever the reasoning, they have a place to play. and yes the pros have them too, they are called farm systems. ahl, ihl, canadian football league, everything around the world where americans can play and not be on a professional team is something other than the top class. I am sorry to break it down that way. but it is very simple.
if you don't like a,b,c,d divisions, gold or silver, call it tier system. either way, you are getting the same competitively performing schools playing come playoff time. you want to keep it as now 8classes, then 9a is an open class for the top 32 teams in the state top4 from each class) to find out which school is the best. if you think leo or dls is chomping at the bit to play mc every year that is just foolish. if you think stagg is somehow saying holy crap I cannot wait to play lwe or hf is just dumb. maybe some of the kids that know some of the kids around from grade school ball whatever. you think every year in and year out oaklawn says damn we have richards scheduled & hopefully your not their homecoming game bhwaaahahaha,
and no I am not saying every team gets a trophy but, in that class or tier yes. what it would actually come out too, in reality is more like the old 4or6class system with 8classes. your good teams will make up the top 4or6classes and your not consistently great teams would make up the last 4or2classes. you are still giving out the same amount of trophies.
and maybe you are right some of the larger schools will most likely rise to the top but the cps, and consistently in last place in your conference schools can play each other. more competitive for them and better learning experience for all players. no matter what level they play at.
so what you are trying to say is that in college because they can give so many schollys the kids that did not get those schollys still deserve to play at that level right?
but, just for lessor college scholly right??? or lower division.
cream always rises to the top. call it what you want to call.
no school or kid for that matter gives a crap come game nite to say hey we held estl to 57pts., but what a great rivalry game, damn we did not get that cowchip this year maybe next year.
the only way to continually grow, is if you push yourself. and playing against kids(schools) that can not compete is not any good for either.
I actually like what they are doing with the private schools, with the success factor, only they should be doing it with ALL schools.
but hey if you got 6more kids you move up or down.. comeon.
the only reason class sizes existed is because lessor schools wanted a chance plain and simple.
otherwise it would be winner takes all.
 
you have 8classes right now. that is the most give everyone a trophy concept out there. and yes, the reason colleges have all those different classifications simply because you have kids that are not that good enough to make it at a top school or grades levels to make into big school, whatever the reasoning, they have a place to play. and yes the pros have them too, they are called farm systems. ahl, ihl, canadian football league, everything around the world where americans can play and not be on a professional team is something other than the top class. I am sorry to break it down that way. but it is very simple.
if you don't like a,b,c,d divisions, gold or silver, call it tier system. either way, you are getting the same competitively performing schools playing come playoff time. you want to keep it as now 8classes, then 9a is an open class for the top 32 teams in the state top4 from each class) to find out which school is the best. if you think leo or dls is chomping at the bit to play mc every year that is just foolish. if you think stagg is somehow saying holy crap I cannot wait to play lwe or hf is just dumb. maybe some of the kids that know some of the kids around from grade school ball whatever. you think every year in and year out oaklawn says damn we have richards scheduled & hopefully your not their homecoming game bhwaaahahaha,
and no I am not saying every team gets a trophy but, in that class or tier yes. what it would actually come out too, in reality is more like the old 4or6class system with 8classes. your good teams will make up the top 4or6classes and your not consistently great teams would make up the last 4or2classes. you are still giving out the same amount of trophies.
and maybe you are right some of the larger schools will most likely rise to the top but the cps, and consistently in last place in your conference schools can play each other. more competitive for them and better learning experience for all players. no matter what level they play at.
so what you are trying to say is that in college because they can give so many schollys the kids that did not get those schollys still deserve to play at that level right?
but, just for lessor college scholly right??? or lower division.
cream always rises to the top. call it what you want to call.
no school or kid for that matter gives a crap come game nite to say hey we held estl to 57pts., but what a great rivalry game, damn we did not get that cowchip this year maybe next year.
the only way to continually grow, is if you push yourself. and playing against kids(schools) that can not compete is not any good for either.
I actually like what they are doing with the private schools, with the success factor, only they should be doing it with ALL schools.
but hey if you got 6more kids you move up or down.. comeon.
the only reason class sizes existed is because lessor schools wanted a chance plain and simple.
otherwise it would be winner takes all.

Don’t have time to address all this at moment but your comparison of college and pro systems to this are totally off base. And 8 enrollment classifications is not the same as multiple “quality” classifications in terms of the “giving everyone a trophy” concept. No one minds saying they are the best small school in the state (best 1a, 2a, etc). You think they want the say they were the best of the worst teams in the state. “ Yeah we were in the “F division” and won state” “oh, cool so F division, then is A the biggest or smallest in your state?” “No bro, A is the best teams and F is the worst teams.” “Uhhhhh?????” “Yeah we won the championship of the grouping of the worst teams in the state!” “Oh, congrats.... I think?!”
 
Lol how did we get here....... does anybody else have any info on what’s really happening maybe more on the York proposal
 
you have 8classes right now. that is the most give everyone a trophy concept out there. and yes, the reason colleges have all those different classifications simply because you have kids that are not that good enough to make it at a top school or grades levels to make into big school, whatever the reasoning, they have a place to play. and yes the pros have them too, they are called farm systems. ahl, ihl, canadian football league, everything around the world where americans can play and not be on a professional team is something other than the top class. I am sorry to break it down that way. but it is very simple.
if you don't like a,b,c,d divisions, gold or silver, call it tier system. either way, you are getting the same competitively performing schools playing come playoff time. you want to keep it as now 8classes, then 9a is an open class for the top 32 teams in the state top4 from each class) to find out which school is the best. if you think leo or dls is chomping at the bit to play mc every year that is just foolish. if you think stagg is somehow saying holy crap I cannot wait to play lwe or hf is just dumb. maybe some of the kids that know some of the kids around from grade school ball whatever. you think every year in and year out oaklawn says damn we have richards scheduled & hopefully your not their homecoming game bhwaaahahaha,
and no I am not saying every team gets a trophy but, in that class or tier yes. what it would actually come out too, in reality is more like the old 4or6class system with 8classes. your good teams will make up the top 4or6classes and your not consistently great teams would make up the last 4or2classes. you are still giving out the same amount of trophies.
and maybe you are right some of the larger schools will most likely rise to the top but the cps, and consistently in last place in your conference schools can play each other. more competitive for them and better learning experience for all players. no matter what level they play at.
so what you are trying to say is that in college because they can give so many schollys the kids that did not get those schollys still deserve to play at that level right?
but, just for lessor college scholly right??? or lower division.
cream always rises to the top. call it what you want to call.
no school or kid for that matter gives a crap come game nite to say hey we held estl to 57pts., but what a great rivalry game, damn we did not get that cowchip this year maybe next year.
the only way to continually grow, is if you push yourself. and playing against kids(schools) that can not compete is not any good for either.
I actually like what they are doing with the private schools, with the success factor, only they should be doing it with ALL schools.
but hey if you got 6more kids you move up or down.. comeon.
the only reason class sizes existed is because lessor schools wanted a chance plain and simple.
otherwise it would be winner takes all.


Additionally in the districts scenario as proposed Leo and delasalle wouldn’t be playing Mt Carmel. Leo for instance would likely be playing the likes of small cps schools, and schools like Walther Christian, Chicago Christian, mooseheart, etc.

And a quick comment on your college comparison: if the best player in America who could go to Alabama if he wanted chose to play for a d3 or d2 school he could! He just chooses not to.... in your proposal good teams and bad teams would be mandated into their levels. I suppose a bad team would be allowed to opt up if they chose but certainly not a good team down.
 
I know this is old take...but all private schools should be in their own class plain and simple. Then go-to 4 public classes. That is 5 total. No more 5 win teams getting in the playoffs. MO
 
  • Like
Reactions: gags33 and go dogz
Additionally in the districts scenario as proposed Leo and delasalle wouldn’t be playing Mt Carmel. Leo for instance would likely be playing the likes of small cps schools, and schools like Walther Christian, Chicago Christian, mooseheart, etc.

And a quick comment on your college comparison: if the best player in America who could go to Alabama if he wanted chose to play for a d3 or d2 school he could! He just chooses not to.... in your proposal good teams and bad teams would be mandated into their levels. I suppose a bad team would be allowed to opt up if they chose but certainly not a good team down.

I am not following you about the players not wanting to play at a top competition school. does not make sense.
if he chose to play a d2 or juco school there would be a reason most likely grades or could not spell your name either way, he has a place to play at whatever level of competition he wanted to play in.

its competition levels not good or bad teams. and yes, if a school that was in the lower class plays and beats schools during regular season of a higher competition level they can get ranked into the next level up. and yes the top classes will also have drought years and moved up or down accordingly to their respective ranking..
it is simply a ranking of schools. you rank the schools now basically but noone truly knows how to rank that team. why? because you want them to play according to their school size and beat up on teams of lessor caliber, so they get into a playoff of 5games.

class size is meaningless right now. no one can figure how to appropriately justify class size. it should simply be fbe(frosh-sr) to begin with and then ranked gets you into a proper competition class size. there are plenty of matrix to use to justify ranking systems.
California use a very good one. I think re-align every 4years. and they I think boys enrollment it might be school size to start, but they re-align into different classes with success.

the playoffs are 5games that is it. why shouldn't the best 8/16/32teams face off and play to see which is the best, and so on and so on. you are simply doing the same thing but because of class size you are saying a team with 300kids in school is not as good as a team with 8000kids in school. it is still 44kids facing off against each other.
larger schools possibly can have more depth, private schools definitely have more depth. but what is happening now is basically what I am talking about except they are not doing it with public schools. if they success factored up public schools there would be NO issues. I honestly don't care one way or the other, you asked for something other than districts. but you need districts/regions to determine your current #of schools in your enrollment class sizes. even if we stay the same and use pure enrollment size, you will need district/regions to determine scheduling of like sized schools. the only way it works.
 
The fact that some schools continued to look for later in the season opponents for '21 and beyond for a while on the IHSA open dates post, after districts were announced, tells me that a good number of schools didn't think it would stick...
 
Districts cause more problems then they solve.
One of the rumors I have heard from a couple of coaches in McHenry county is the IHSA will overturn districts for all teams making the playoffs - which is what they have wanted all along.
 
One of the rumors I have heard from a couple of coaches in McHenry county is the IHSA will overturn districts for all teams making the playoffs - which is what they have wanted all along.
What would that look like? Only non-playoff teams are districted heading into the next season? How would scheduling work if that is the case? I think I'm misunderstanding something here.
 
That was my initial thought too but I believe he means all teams make the playoffs. How that looks is open for speculation but I favor that approach over districts. Maybe top 1/3 of teams get a bye and play from there
 
  • Like
Reactions: PanthersWildcats86
All in for playoffs will be 512 teams in playoffs instead of current 256.
That means to not mess with scheduling that it will be an 8-game regular season and every team gets at least 1 playoff game.
That will keep the playing calendar as it is now. That also means in first round of playoffs in each class that 8-0 teams will be playing 0-8 teams. 7-1 teams will get 1-7 teams, etc. each of the 8 class brackets will be 64 teams and based on serious travel issues all districts you would think would be divided into quads.
Points to ponder:
Is it desirable for a 1-7 or 0-8 team to end its season with a game against an 8-0 or 7-1 team?
Since 5 wins won’t be needed to make the playoffs, will there be amazing Week 1 matchups such as Mt. Carmel vs. Lincoln-Way East and/or Simeon vs. Loyola?
Or, because an 8-team conference will have league games in Weeks 2-8, and a 7-team conference needs 7 weeks to complete a round-robin league schedule, there will be far fewer non-conference games so attractive matchups will be reduced in numbers.
An all-in for playoffs means the number of entries has to hit on 512. Will the IHSA get to that number by adding/subtracting the number of Chicago Public League teams that will play in the playoffs each year?
Any team total more than 512 would create the need for “play-in” games to get to the magic 512 number. And since that would add another week to the season it means the regular season would start a week earlier in August which means in most years three games would be played before Labor Day which also means practice would start earlier in the heat of August. That also means teams not involved in play-in games would get a bye while play-in games reduced the field to 512. That means a powerhouse 8-0 team will get an extra week to prepare for a showdown against the survivor of a play-in game between two 1-7 type teams.
The guess here is that if everybody makes the playoffs that the IHSA expands the number of classes from 8 to 11 with 48 teams in each class. That gets 528 teams into the playoffs.
Each team plays 8 regular season games and to win a state title will take 13 or 14 games. Since the best teams will likely get a playoff bye they will finish with just 13 games instead of the current 14.
And the first playoff game for a powerhouse team is likely going to be against a mediocre club. Now the 8-1 teams play the 5-4 teams in first round. With all in the 7-1 team will draw a play-in game winner for its first game which could be a 1-7 regular season team.
Figure on enrollment separating the classes just like now. And with all in you will know on day 1 what class you will be on. No more pondering about East St. Louis being 5a or 6a.
I guess the view here is that allowing all in for the football playoffs involves a huge number of changes, just as going to districts involves a huge number of changes. Since we don’t know how either plan will work it’s hard to say which plan is better or less evil.
Obviously some will suggest expanding the playoffs but not letting every team participate. That brings up many other questions as well.
If there was a great solution it would have occurred already.
Thanks for reading.
 
All in for playoffs will be 512 teams in playoffs instead of current 256.
That means to not mess with scheduling that it will be an 8-game regular season and every team gets at least 1 playoff game.
That will keep the playing calendar as it is now. That also means in first round of playoffs in each class that 8-0 teams will be playing 0-8 teams. 7-1 teams will get 1-7 teams, etc. each of the 8 class brackets will be 64 teams and based on serious travel issues all districts you would think would be divided into quads.
Points to ponder:
Is it desirable for a 1-7 or 0-8 team to end its season with a game against an 8-0 or 7-1 team?
Since 5 wins won’t be needed to make the playoffs, will there be amazing Week 1 matchups such as Mt. Carmel vs. Lincoln-Way East and/or Simeon vs. Loyola?
Or, because an 8-team conference will have league games in Weeks 2-8, and a 7-team conference needs 7 weeks to complete a round-robin league schedule, there will be far fewer non-conference games so attractive matchups will be reduced in numbers.
An all-in for playoffs means the number of entries has to hit on 512. Will the IHSA get to that number by adding/subtracting the number of Chicago Public League teams that will play in the playoffs each year?
Any team total more than 512 would create the need for “play-in” games to get to the magic 512 number. And since that would add another week to the season it means the regular season would start a week earlier in August which means in most years three games would be played before Labor Day which also means practice would start earlier in the heat of August. That also means teams not involved in play-in games would get a bye while play-in games reduced the field to 512. That means a powerhouse 8-0 team will get an extra week to prepare for a showdown against the survivor of a play-in game between two 1-7 type teams.
The guess here is that if everybody makes the playoffs that the IHSA expands the number of classes from 8 to 11 with 48 teams in each class. That gets 528 teams into the playoffs.
Each team plays 8 regular season games and to win a state title will take 13 or 14 games. Since the best teams will likely get a playoff bye they will finish with just 13 games instead of the current 14.
And the first playoff game for a powerhouse team is likely going to be against a mediocre club. Now the 8-1 teams play the 5-4 teams in first round. With all in the 7-1 team will draw a play-in game winner for its first game which could be a 1-7 regular season team.
Figure on enrollment separating the classes just like now. And with all in you will know on day 1 what class you will be on. No more pondering about East St. Louis being 5a or 6a.
I guess the view here is that allowing all in for the football playoffs involves a huge number of changes, just as going to districts involves a huge number of changes. Since we don’t know how either plan will work it’s hard to say which plan is better or less evil.
Obviously some will suggest expanding the playoffs but not letting every team participate. That brings up many other questions as well.
If there was a great solution it would have occurred already.
Thanks for reading.

My hope......
Expand to 48 teams per class.
No districts. Regular conference scheduling.
8 week regular season.
384 playoff qualifiers are decided after week 8 based on number of wins and playoff points.
That part is just like now. Classes not determined until playoffs start. 0-8 teams get left out. Cutoff to qualify would probably be 2 wins, perhaps 1 some years.

Week 9 becomes round 1 of playoffs. Top 16 in each class get a bye. Bottom 32 have a play in round. This means 2-6 teams likely open the playoffs against 6-2 teams, thus eliminating the worst mismatches that an all in format would have in round one.

Only down side is that bye week, but it’s a decent reward for an undefeated or one loss season. And no 0-8 or 1-7 team is going to whine about not making the playoffs. Plus with a very low win threshold to qualify, a lot of the scheduling headaches may be solved.
 
A lot of good ideas here. But unfortunately I'm guessing our posters do not work for the IHSA or are the school administrators who will voting on this.
 
What would that look like? Only non-playoff teams are districted heading into the next season? How would scheduling work if that is the case? I think I'm misunderstanding something here.
The conferences would pretty much stay as they are... all teams (like baseball and basketball) would make the playoffs. The IHSA is looking at how many more playoff games would be played and the revenue generated.
 
My hope......
Expand to 48 teams per class.
No districts. Regular conference scheduling.
8 week regular season.
384 playoff qualifiers are decided after week 8 based on number of wins and playoff points.
That part is just like now. Classes not determined until playoffs start. 0-8 teams get left out. Cutoff to qualify would probably be 2 wins, perhaps 1 some years.

Week 9 becomes round 1 of playoffs. Top 16 in each class get a bye. Bottom 32 have a play in round. This means 2-6 teams likely open the playoffs against 6-2 teams, thus eliminating the worst mismatches that an all in format would have in round one.

Only down side is that bye week, but it’s a decent reward for an undefeated or one loss season. And no 0-8 or 1-7 team is going to whine about not making the playoffs. Plus with a very low win threshold to qualify, a lot of the scheduling headaches may be solved.
Why would you hope for a 2 win team to be in the playoffs - ever?
 
Why would you hope for a 2 win team to be in the playoffs - ever?
Because districts will lead to a terrible regular season and many lesser programs dropping football entirely. and the current status quo doesn’t seem like it will have any traction in overturning districts.

So let’s just expand the playoff field to avoid districts coming to fruition. And I dislike the idea of doubling the playoff field and letting everyone in so I think the 48 team classes is the best way to achieve the goal of preventing districts and watching terrible football in the regular season.

So to clarify I prefer the status quo and don’t want an expansion of the playoffs. But I think that’s the only way to get enough members to support overturning the worse evil of districts and seeing JC vs Rich South in the regular season.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HSfan48 and Gene K.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT