I have never been a fan of transfers as a general proposition perhaps because I am older and from a generation that if you transferred it was because you were kicked out of school and had to transfer. I attended St. Pats when my class alone had over 400 boys and a total of over 1600 in the school. I made lifelong friends among those I went to school with and it seems odd to me that a kid would pick up and leave one school and go to another for the sole reason of athletics leaving the friends he had made behind.
It apears from the empirical evidence that many transfers, but not all, are simply due to athletics and the ability to be able to have the opportunity to play on a team more successful than the team the kid is currently playing on. Alternatively it appears that a transfer may be initiated in order for the kid to get playing time he will not get at his current school. In any event it at some point the IHSA recognized that the transfer situation was getting out of control when kids transfering was no longer an exception, but became routine.
I don't know what the solution is to the transfer question or if the policies in place at the IHSA are the answer. What I think is, from my perspective, that it must be difficult for the kid that is transferring from one school to another, regardless of his athletic ability for a number of reasons, none of which have anything to do with athletics.
I think before parents have there child transfer to another school they should think long and hard about the lessons that will be ingrained in the child as a result of the transfer, particularly if the transfer is for athletic reasons alone.