I agree with you that something is wrong there but maybe the new coach can change things? We shall see. It will take time.
Let’s not forget culture. Something is lacking at LP maybe the new coach can get the parents and community involved, then maybe the kids will come play for him.
Corey:
Ordinarily, I wouldn't wade into a discussion over a school of which I have so little knowledge, but I do have an vast ecosystem of acquaintances to whom I regularly speak; and one is somewhat aware of the state of affairs at LTHS.
I tend to agree with you over your point there may exist a cultural issue at Lockport. But which kind of cultural issue? Is it an issue among students, within the program, or does it lay inside the school's administration? While many involved in this thread are questioning the state of the program, the relationship between feeder programs and the LTHS football, and the former head coach, I think you have, in a very understated way, done a service to this thread for alluding to the reality any problem at LTHS may lay elsewhere other than with the head coach or feeder programs and could reside in the school's administration.
I've lived in Winnetka since 1984 and have since witnessed administrators and educators come and go from both New Trier and LA. With numerous neighbors enrolling their kids at both schools, and three of mine matriculating through LA, I am often kept appraised of what occurs at both schools.
The reason I chose to enter into this thread is because the now-former head coach served at New Trier for four years before leaving for Lockport; his time at NT gave me some insight over how he led the program. From scouring the newspaper archives, I discovered he was the head coach at Glenbard South prior to joining NT. I glanced at his record at both schools and he won approximately 60 percent of his games at both schools.
After arriving at Glenbard South, a school which had virtually no consistent success of which to speak, he enjoyed a 37-26 record in six years, with four playoff appearances. In his fifth and sixth year, both 9-3 seasons, the program twice advanced to the state quarterfinals. I think it is fair to say he had the program on solid footing.
At New Trier, and I have an abundance of knowledge on this matter from NT parents, Starkey inherited a team in complete disunity, with kids retreating from the program in substantial numbers. I believe he had the NT's program advancing in the same course as he had at Glenbard South and was building some momentum before he departed for Lockport. At NT, he qualified for the playoffs all four years. From my familiarity with parents of students enrolled at NT at the time, players entering and returning to the program surged and had a better experience under him.
I do not know why he left NT for Lockport, one supposes NT would be a plum job, but as the head coach at two schools before taking over at Lockport, the man found success.
At Lockport, he, once again, came into a program which had won 11 games in the three year period before he arrived, including years in which the team went 1-8 and 3-6. Reversing a downward trajectory, Starkey's first three season saw him guide the team to 3-6, 4-5, and 6-3 seasons. This is a complete turnaround from the three-year tenure of his predecessor. In his time as head coach, Lockport beat two of the three LW teams and also beat Bolingbrook for the first time in nearly a decade.
While his final two years were not as successful, I am aware of the fact during his tenure the schools experienced a significant turnover in administrative personnel, including three ADs in a five year period.
Three ADs in a five-year period is a powerful suggestion of a muddled hierarchy at the school, and perhaps with the district administration. Say, for example, a Fortune 500 firm has three CFOs in a five year period. If such a scenario emerged at Boeing, for instance, it would indicate a rudderless corporate structure, the stock value would plummet, and investors would flee.
In either setting, corporate or educational, it's a sign of chaos, or worse, toxicity.
It is also my understanding some of the new administrators are acquainted with the new coach, and were inclined to see him at the helm at Lockport. Moreover, I understand the culture at Lockport today is such it practically demands athletes compete in only one sport. A "one-sport" environment is equally toxic.
My overarching point is it appears if the new head coach was the beneficiary of a relationship with new administrators and the district leadership at LTHS.
My suspicion is there are more factors in this storyline and I believe it rests above the football program, beyond feeder programs, and the former head coach. I am not implying anything sinister in any way, but the turnover in administration in such a short period of time, and the shifting of personnel, some of whom originated in the LW school district, and their arrival at LTHS, have left me with the impression the school waited for a poor season and ousted Starkey.
I hasten to tip my homburg to CB for mentioning how the LWN fans here succumbed to hysterical fits when the Phoenix lost a playoff game to WWS only a few years back. I wish Czart no ill will, but the man was rhetorically bludgeoned by several posters for what they claimed at the time was dreadful mismanagement of the game.
If there is an issue at Lockport, I don't fully believe it exists with the former head coach. Rather, it could be a problem with the administration.