Why no third Lockport Township High School?: The short explanation. Back in the mid 90's there was crazy residential growth within the District. The School Board did the right thing in purchasing land for a future building. Yes, we had five referendums. They all failed. I'm a numbers freak. Numbers tell me stories. Contrary to what most people believe it was not the voters of Crest Hill or Lockport who rejected building a new high school in Homer Glen. It was the voters of Homer Glen who pushed the vote into the NO category. After each referendum I did a review of the precincts in Homer Glen. Every single precinct in Homer Glen voted a resounding NO (60-40) to every referendum. Crest Hill and Lockport were in the 52-48 NO range. At that time Homer Glen had a larger population than either Crest Hill or Lockport. Had the vote gone 52-48 YES in Homer Glen for any of the referendums the referendum would have passed. I even printed up the results to show people of Homer Glen that they had nobody but themselves to blame for the failure of ALL of the referendums. Even with the data in front of them they didn't believe me.
Now, fast forward to 2009 when the recession hit. All residential development in the LTHS District ceased. When the recession ended in 2014 Lockport and Homer Glen were on different paths. Homer Glen got CRAZY POLITICAL. Lockport didn't. The politics in Homer Glen focused on keeping things the way they were. Most importantly, they didn't want any residential growth because they didn't want to burden themselves with increased taxes paid to any school. Lockport on the other hand did the opposite. For the record, I have been a part of the decision making process in Lockport for the past decade as a member of the Planning Commission and I'm now in my 3rd term as an alderman. Our approach was to create a plan to have balanced commercial, retail and residential growth by taking advantage of the three interchanges off of I-355 (Archer Avenue, 143rd Street and 159th Street). It took us until about 2018 to really get things rolling. We had a Council, Mayor and Staff that had a unified vision of growth. A decade after first being elected I'm amazed at what we have achieved. Yes, there has been some residential growth. We've added about 3000 people since 2013.
Which raises the next question of what did Homer Glen do during the past 10 years. The truth is, it was a whole lot of nothing. There has only been one residential development approved in Homer Glen during the past 10 years. That development is approximately 42 townhomes. They haven't approved any single family home developments in about 15 years. Why? Because they have been so busy with the political nonsense that they have rejected every single residential development because they don't want to build new schools and have their taxes go up.
There also hasn't been any residential development in Crest Hill in well over 20 years. Thus, the current and projected population of the LTHS District hasn't really changed in the past 15 years. The projected student population in the next decade or more really doesn't show any increase. Thus, there really isn't a need to build a third building. The current two buildings are serving the District well. I don't see any residential growth in Crest Hill for no other reason than there isn't any land available. I don't see any residential growth in Homer Glen in the next two decades because they have the most expensive water in the Chicagoland area. Plus, in order to develop they will have to build a waste water treatment plant that will cost in the neighborhood of $40 million in 2023 dollars. Homer Glen doesn't have a revenue source to build a waste water treatment plant. The politics of Homer Glen won't allow for elected officials to make the hard decision to raise taxes or fees to cover the cost of the waste water treatment plant. No treatment plant means no development.
No development in Homer Glen means no high school in Homer Glen.
Now we have a decision to make in March. Do we vote yes to sell bonds in the $85 million range to modernize Lockport Central? Or, do we vote no? The projected cost of a new building in 2005 was in the $200 million range. Add $150 million to that cost now. I'm all for the $85 million to renovate Central.