ADVERTISEMENT

Will The Multiplier Get Raised After This Year?

niualum2002

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Oct 23, 2004
211
219
43
8 of the 16 teams in the State Finals are Private Schools. They are spread out over 7 different classes and we could have a scenario with 7 private school champions and East St. Louis as the 8th who plays a national schedule. Does this provide the impetus for an IHSA by-law vote to raise the multiplier? A 2.0 multiplier would mean Brother Rice and Mt. Carmel for sure would be in 8A. Fenwick would be on the 8A/7A bubble.

A 2.5 multiplier puts Brother Rice, Mt. Carmel, Fenwick and St. Rita into 8A with Nazareth and St. Francis into 7A. Those schools could probably be competitive in those classes but obviously wouldn't want to be a part of eliminating each other throughout the playoffs.

I'm not weighing in one way or the other, but to me I feel there is going to be an public school response through the IHSA to private schools in football making so many state title games, and I think it will be accelerated after the Lincoln-Way East loss tonight to Loyola.

I feel something will come about in the next year based off of how this years playoff results have played out.
 
I think the only thing that should be looked at is the two year cycle enrollment/multiplier/waiver thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gobears25
8 of the 16 teams in the State Finals are Private Schools. They are spread out over 7 different classes and we could have a scenario with 7 private school champions and East St. Louis as the 8th who plays a national schedule. Does this provide the impetus for an IHSA by-law vote to raise the multiplier? A 2.0 multiplier would mean Brother Rice and Mt. Carmel for sure would be in 8A. Fenwick would be on the 8A/7A bubble.

A 2.5 multiplier puts Brother Rice, Mt. Carmel, Fenwick and St. Rita into 8A with Nazareth and St. Francis into 7A. Those schools could probably be competitive in those classes but obviously wouldn't want to be a part of eliminating each other throughout the playoffs.

I'm not weighing in one way or the other, but to me I feel there is going to be an public school response through the IHSA to private schools in football making so many state title games, and I think it will be accelerated after the Lincoln-Way East loss tonight to Loyola.

I feel something will come about in the next year based off of how this years playoff results have played out.
In short, no. There were 5 or 6 privates last year and 7 in 2022 that were in the finals.
 
I think the only thing that should be looked at is the two year cycle enrollment/multiplier/waiver thing.
Yeah I don't why that shouldn't be a yearly thing considering they get those numbers on a yearly basis.
 
Last edited:
8 of the 16 teams in the State Finals are Private Schools. They are spread out over 7 different classes and we could have a scenario with 7 private school champions and East St. Louis as the 8th who plays a national schedule. Does this provide the impetus for an IHSA by-law vote to raise the multiplier? A 2.0 multiplier would mean Brother Rice and Mt. Carmel for sure would be in 8A. Fenwick would be on the 8A/7A bubble.

A 2.5 multiplier puts Brother Rice, Mt. Carmel, Fenwick and St. Rita into 8A with Nazareth and St. Francis into 7A. Those schools could probably be competitive in those classes but obviously wouldn't want to be a part of eliminating each other throughout the playoffs.

I'm not weighing in one way or the other, but to me I feel there is going to be an public school response through the IHSA to private schools in football making so many state title games, and I think it will be accelerated after the Lincoln-Way East loss tonight to Loyola.

I feel something will come about in the next year based off of how this years playoff results have played out.
Doesn’t matter…the good private schools will say “bring it on” and will go unfazed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jenny27
To your point, the next two year cycle will have both Brother Rice and Marist not multiplied, since neither one has won 3 playoff games in this 2-year cycle.
SHG and ICCP are in that discussion also
 
  • Love
Reactions: k1867
I think the only thing that should be looked at is the two year cycle enrollment/multiplier/waiver thing.
The format, especially the new format definitely creates huge unintended consequences. Like 5A will suddenly open up kind of wide next year... For a St Francis team who could be primed to run through it. You could invision a flip-flop into 25/26 then 27/28 where top teams just take turns being success factored.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doctor_d
I think the only thing that should be looked at is the two year cycle enrollment/multiplier/waiver thing.
The IHSA redid the rules to make it easier on Private schools to be successful. I am under the theory this was done to push more schools to want separation.

Multiplier is not the issue. The two year cycle is dumb, using enrollments from 4 years ago for now is dumber, and success factor only counting if it happens exactly during the two year cycle is the dumbest of all.

They also made it harder to get hit with the multiplier. It use to be one playoff win every five years, now it is 3 in the specific two year window for the following window. So even though St. Laurence lost in the title game last year, they are not multiplied for that until the 2025 season.
 
Doesn’t matter…the good private schools will say “bring it on” and will go unfazed.
Would they though in a 2.5 multiplier system where potentially almost 25% of the 8A class is Loyola, Mt. Carmel, Brother Rice, Marist, St. Ignatius, St. Rita and Fenwick?

I think that would get some pushback if they were all eliminating each other in the quarters and semis.
 
To your point, the next two year cycle will have both Brother Rice and Marist not multiplied, since neither one has won 3 playoff games in this 2-year cycle.
Also dropping down….
IC 2a
SHG 3a

Teams moving up that shouldn’t be….
Chicago Christian 4a
Wheaton Acd 5a
 
Would they though in a 2.5 multiplier system where potentially almost 25% of the 8A class is Loyola, Mt. Carmel, Brother Rice, Marist, St. Ignatius, St. Rita and Fenwick?

I think that would get some pushback if they were all eliminating each other in the quarters and semis.
Private schools don’t ever bitch about the multiplier. They focus on winning.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: Jenny27
Also dropping down….
IC 2a
SHG 3a

Teams moving up that shouldn’t be….
Chicago Christian 4a
Wheaton Acd 5a
Exactly. I don't think the public schools are going to allow IC and SHG to be in 2A and 3A respectively based off of this years playoff results. I see a potentially major upgrade of the multiplier coming and a dare to private schools to leave the IHSA if they don't like it.
 
Private schools doesn’t ever bitch about the multiplier. They focus on winning.
I think there are thousands of posts on this site from private school fans proving otherwise. Yes nothing from the schools themselves, but it would already be done if private schools and their fans were not absolutly opposed to the multiplier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alexander32
To your point, the next two year cycle will have both Brother Rice and Marist not multiplied, since neither one has won 3 playoff games in this 2-year cycle.
Where would non multiplied BR and Marist likely wind up? 6A?

If they wouldn't have had this ridiculous 2 year window deal, MC would have been bumped to 8A and Naz bumped to 6A this year.

That doesn't solve every issue public proponents have, but it does eliminate the two biggest outliers. Public schools rightly shaking their heads and asking themselves "going for a 3peat in the same class? I thought we had a success factor for back to back champions." And then everyone realizing that there is a success factor but the IHSA has really screwed up its implementation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pjjp
I would think Rice will be 6A. Not sure about Marist. The 2-year window is too short. Never really understood it.
 
8 of the 16 teams in the State Finals are Private Schools. They are spread out over 7 different classes and we could have a scenario with 7 private school champions and East St. Louis as the 8th who plays a national schedule. Does this provide the impetus for an IHSA by-law vote to raise the multiplier? A 2.0 multiplier would mean Brother Rice and Mt. Carmel for sure would be in 8A. Fenwick would be on the 8A/7A bubble.

A 2.5 multiplier puts Brother Rice, Mt. Carmel, Fenwick and St. Rita into 8A with Nazareth and St. Francis into 7A. Those schools could probably be competitive in those classes but obviously wouldn't want to be a part of eliminating each other throughout the playoffs.

I'm not weighing in one way or the other, but to me I feel there is going to be an public school response through the IHSA to private schools in football making so many state title games, and I think it will be accelerated after the Lincoln-Way East loss tonight to Loyola.

I feel something will come about in the next year based off of how this years playoff results have played out.
Quit whining son!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT