I’m sure like the other team scrimmages, this night has become more vanilla over the last few years. Starters only play 2-3 series while running very basic plays and then it’s mostly the 2nd and 3rd teamers battling for the remainder of the scrimmage.
So based on what I saw in a 60-minute period last night and some feedback over last couple weeks…
QB - looks like both SRs are going to play. I think both can be “QB1” but do wish there was a clear-cut choice. I suppose it will depend on strength of opposing defenses.
RB - the Navy commit (5’11 200+) is solid and will get the bulk of carries with some change of pace guys as depth.
WR - a little on the smaller side (none over 6 ft) but top 3 have legit speed.
OL/TE - comprised of 8-9 seniors with good size. The LT (6’7 290) can move too and they expect a big season out of the returning RT. The OL should be the most improved group from last year. This unit might determine which QB plays more…
DL - replacing older Pierce is not possible from a size/ability standpoint but I like the makeup of this group. Will have to scrap against some bigger OLs though. The soph DT (6’3 250) looks the part as a D1 prospect - in the interior rotation for now with two SRs.
LB - younger Pierce (6’1 215) will be all over the place and the other 3 are solid seniors. Dependable group.
DB - very athletic group with a couple of juniors that have next-level potential. This unit was exposed last yr vs MC and LA. If they can hold own in ‘23, front 7 should be able to be a little more aggressive.
K - liked what I saw last night during FG time. Believe he’s getting some college interest.
Most important thing is I didn’t see any “glaring” weaknesses but that obviously could change in 6-days vs an 8A juggernaut.
Weighing the brutal schedule, returning players, rising juniors that impressed on soph level last season and year-two under current head coach, it wouldn’t surprise me if this team finished 4-5 or 7-2.
Let’s get at least 5…
- 2022 Poster of the Year