But why does that matter? Isn't the most important metric the score? Isn't some of the play calling driven by "take what they will give you?" if they are giving the
Fair enough. I get what you are saying. AC had 39 passing and 26 rushing attempts, a total of 67 plays. That seems fairly balanced on the surface.
What I am trying to explain is that perhaps a dozen of the rushing attempts occurred on the last possession and the goal was to kill the clock. Therefore it is very likely the pass to rush ratio may have been 39 to 14 which is a 26% run percentage.
Fair enough. I get what you are saying. AC had 39 passing and 26 rushing attempts, a total of 67 plays. That seems fairly balanced on the surface.
What I am trying to explain is that perhaps a dozen of the rushing attempts occurred on the last possession and the goal was to kill the clock. Therefore it is very likely the pass to rush ratio may have been 39 to 14 which is a 26% run percentage.
Thanks Catbox this has been very helpful and I'm sure our teams are on a collision course. Good Luck the rest of the season.
pass and the D can't stop it, why would you not keep taking it? if they were going 3 and out consistently and gassing their O, sure makes sense, but, if they are blowing teams out and most importantly have the talent and ability to excel at the pass, why not use it? Seems that some programs get just as much locked into "we must run" then don't have the ability to come back when down big in Q4.