JCHILL can defend himself, but I don't see that he is condoning this kind of behavior. What I see him saying is that there's nothing wrong with hazing if it is not taken to the extreme.
I would hope, corey, that you can not only see the difference between, but also ALLOW FOR AND APPROVE OF, clean and light-hearted team building exercises that make kids step out of their comfort zones and hazing that involves bullying and dangerous/abhorrent/deviant behavior.
A problem with our society, whether it be on football teams, message boards, the office, state high school athletic associations, church men's club casino nights, etc., is our proclivity to take things to the extreme. Nobody is satisfied with what worked last year, last month, last week or yesterday. If we are doing something today, it has to be bigger and better than it was the last time we did it. If we want to make a point, we utilize extreme circumstances as examples to bolster our point.
So, corey, I ask you, is there a happy medium here that you can accept? Or are you going to double down and say that all hazing is bad and should be avoided/banned in all its possible versions?