Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1 thru 32 seeing across ALL classes would solve this problem21/30 quarterfinals games (2 close ones being played right now) were more than 2 score difference. 67% of games not close, even after 2 rounds of weeding out teams. Sports aren’t fair or equal.
7A has 1-32. Closest game this weekend was 45-281 thru 32 seeing across ALL classes would solve this problem
As i said, across ALL classes would solve this problem7A has 1-32. Closest game this weekend was 45-28
How would this solve the problem?1 thru 32 seeing across ALL classes would solve this problem
It gets rid of the lower seeds who might get a break by playing a weak team with a great record. Such is the case as when SHG played Rochester last year in the semis. That was the title game. Or the other seasons you can recall when a team gets blown out in the title game after the victor won a close semifinal.How would this solve the problem?
The logic behind 1-32 seeding is to reward higher seeds. In theory you are isolating the top seeds (numerically) from each other as much as possible.
Prairie Ridge on line 1.1 thru 32 seeing across ALL classes would solve this problem
Yea I guess that makes sense. I'm certainly not against 1-32.It gets rid of the lower seeds who might get a break by playing a weak team with a great record. Such is the case as when SHG played Rochester last year in the semis. That was the title game. Or the other seasons you can recall when a team gets blown out in the title game after the victor won a close semifinal.
1 thru 32 quickly eliminates the weak low seeds and the weak middle seeds with good records. It also mixes up the matchups and makes the games more interesting as you find a coal city, playing a Carterville or maybe some of these CPS schools can play a sacred Heart Griffin.
I am also a fan of reseeding with each round, just as they do in the NFL. After all. if getting a top seed is to mean something, that team should have the easiest route to the final and the lower performing team should have a harder route. This will allow the number one and number two seed to meet in the final as they should.
Not to be rude but many schools who used to be very competitive have changed.After they tore down many housing projects those people moved to various suburbs & downstate communities & others left so the makeup changed. That basically turned a lot into glorified CPS teams with more resources but similar results. It even effected CPS teams like Curie,Bogan & othersWhat's the rational behind 20 years ago the playoffs didn't see blowouts at the rate we do today.
My amateur guesses...What's the rational behind 20 years ago the playoffs didn't see blowouts at the rate we do today.
I think yesterday was expected score wise except for the 1A game. Today should be close in two of the 4.4 games today, three were 3-score+. The one game not 3-score, was a shutout. To be fair, a very impressive shutout