We beat them and Mount Carmel was clobbered by 2 TD's. That is how it went for us.Looks like you guys had a common opponent in BR....how'd that go for you?
We beat them and Mount Carmel was clobbered by 2 TD's. That is how it went for us.Looks like you guys had a common opponent in BR....how'd that go for you?
I am confused a bit. Does anyone really know if JCA ran away from Rita. Could there have been other factors? Why would JCA from Spring knowing they had their best team in 20 years run from Rita and then schedule Simeon who at the time was rated extremely high. I don't even believe we were the favorite. I would be curious of someone in the know from Rita could shed some light on this.JCA has to do what's best for JCA. I don't mind them not renewing the contract with Rita; it was a great two-year battle.
For next year, I would ask Rita to schedule a weaker opponent during Week Two. Although I think Cascia will be a good team next year, he won't be as good as this year. I want the wins to get into the playoffs.
With MC, LA, PC, Naz, and Don Benet on the schedule, it will be tough enough.
Throughout last two years, posters have referred to it. No one disputed it, so I went with it in my post. I'd loved to hear the behind-the-scenes version.I am confused a bit. Does anyone really know if JCA ran away from Rita. Could there have been other factors? Why would JCA from Spring knowing they had their best team in 20 years run from Rita and then schedule Simeon who at the time was rated extremely high. I don't even believe we were the favorite. I would be curious of someone in the know from Rita could shed some light on this.
Thanks!! Me too.Throughout last two years, posters have referred to it. No one disputed it, so I went with it in my post. I'd loved to hear the behind-the-scenes version.
Somehow, there were no common opponents in the playoffs.Looks like you guys had a common opponent in BR....how'd that go for you?
I disagree. They are better than decent. Rita will have their hands full. Your kidding yourself if you think they got to the final with a decent team. That’s a border line foolish comment. Just saying Rita will have their hands full IMO. No one in the final got their by being just decent.They are exactly that...a "decent" team. Certainly not a resume building win
Yes but JCA still is playing 4A teams. Just saying it isn’t the same.No but you are arguing that no way can jca be number 1 simply because they are in 4a.
If you put ESL, Loyola, Lockport, etc in 3a, it wouldnt change the fact those teams are as good as any team in the state.
If Georgia played in the Sun Belt, they would still be the best team in college football.
I am talking about cardinal ritter. Im not sure who you are referring to but it doesn't sound like you were talking about CR.I disagree. They are better than decent. Rita will have their hands full. Your kidding yourself if you think they got to the final with a decent team. That’s a border line foolish comment. Just saying Rita will have their hands full IMO. No one in the final got their by being just decent.
Who is the better team and who plays a tougher schedule are two entirely different questions. And it seems like the two get conflated way too often.Yes but JCA still is playing 4A teams. Just saying it isn’t the same.
If a lowly, menial 4a school can beat a team, surely a 7a power should be able to do so as well right?Somehow, there were no common opponents in the playoffs.
Sorry I was talking about WN playing Rita. My bad.I am talking about cardinal ritter. Im not sure who you are referring to but it doesn't sound like you were talking about CR.
They wouldn’t be worse but if your ranking them they would not have the same strength of schedule in 4A as they would in 8A.Who is the better team and who plays a tougher schedule are two entirely different questions. And it seems like the two get conflated way too often.
How would loyola, for example, be a worse team if you took their same exact roster and they played a 4a schedule/playoff?
If Loyola was in 4A, the could send their freshmen.Who is the better team and who plays a tougher schedule are two entirely different questions. And it seems like the two get conflated way too often.
How would loyola, for example, be a worse team if you took their same exact roster and they played a 4a schedule/playoff?
I think Mt. Carmel would have beaten Marengo, Wheaton Academy, Genoa and Ricmond Burton.No. Because they would still get destroyed by their regular season opponents. Methinks you are too much of a homer and not a rational thinker
They'd be the best team in the Sun Belt.No but you are arguing that no way can jca be number 1 simply because they are in 4a.
If you put ESL, Loyola, Lockport, etc in 3a, it wouldnt change the fact those teams are as good as any team in the state.
If Georgia played in the Sun Belt, they would still be the best team in college football.
I think it's pretty obvious why you chose to deflect instead of actually answering the question.If Loyola was in 4A, the could send their freshmen.
The repetitive deflection isn't necessary. It's pretty apparent that your logic doesn't hold waterThey'd be the best team in the Sun Belt.
Son, I'm not the object of so much vitriol because I deflect questions. That's my problem. I'm too direct. I don't back down from anyone - not even the police.I think it's pretty obvious why you chose to deflect instead of actually answering the question.
Yes that is true. But SOS is irrelevant to who is actually a better team.They wouldn’t be worse but if your ranking them they would not have the same strength of schedule in 4A as they would in 8A.
Bartlett freshman canSon, I'm not the object of so much vitriol because I deflect questions. That's my problem. I'm too direct. I don't back down from anyone - not even the police.
BTW, I don't really think that the LA frosh could beat Richmond-Burton.
This is true but it’s one of the only indicators we have because they will never play each other. They can’t all be #1.Yes that is true. But SOS is irrelevant to who is actually a better team.
Way to go, Crisper. I purposely used "vitriol" to see if anyone would catch it. It's an expression that used to get thrown around this board by the less well spoken (usually thrown at me) and it always followed "spew."This board never disappoints, the word “vitriol” being used twice in one night. You guys are making me smarter every day. Thank you.
Way to go, Crisper. I purposely used "vitriol" to see if anyone would catch it. It's an expression that used to get thrown around this board by the less well spoken (usually thrown at me) and it always followed "spew."
Pardon my oxymoron. Can you be less well spoken? Ask the Ignatius guys.
I’m not smart enough to engage the Ignatius guys in conversation…..I’m well aware of my limitations.Way to go, Crisper. I purposely used "vitriol" to see if anyone would catch it. It's an expression that used to get thrown around this board by the less well spoken (usually thrown at me) and it always followed "spew."
Pardon my oxymoron. Can you be less well spoken? Ask the Ignatius guys.
DefinitelyProbably gonna be 500 yards for both teams
Yep, the cigar smoking, top shelf whiskey drinking pinky in the air people are the worse!🤣👍I’m not smart enough to engage the Ignatius guys in conversation…..I’m well aware of my limitations.
So the team itself is elite but because they played a CPS school instead of SR you say they arent?I consider JCA a very good team. Had they not dumped Rita for a CPS team they could be considered elite. BR was also a very good team offensively. But had a little less talent on defensive side of the ball. I was hoping they would have made the finals and wish their departing head coach well. I always thought he took a lot of unnecessary criticism.
I agree, endless argument for sure!Why do rankings matter? Shouldn’t the only thing that matters is winning a title instead of being the best in someone’s opinion?
If rankings don't matter, why have them? I do agree with you, however.Why do rankings matter? Shouldn’t the only thing that matters is winning a title instead of being the best in someone’s opinion?
It gives something for us old guys to argue about on a message board.Why do rankings matter? Shouldn’t the only thing that matters is winning a title instead of being the best in someone’s opinion?
Perhaps. But I actually think the reality of their path to a possible title has exceeded what people’s perceptions of what 4A would be. The final 4 has been exceptional across the board. Would have been nice to play SF instead of Genoa but I guess SF wasn’t that good. Or had a terrible game.I’ve been extremely critical of JCA going 4a. With that said their playoff run was supposed to look like this:
Marengo
Wheaton Acd
Wheaton St Francis
Phillips
Rochester/SHG
If that were to have happened…I wonder if everyone’s opinions (mine included) would be a littler different.
Rankings matter as a sign or respect or validation. Let's face it, others opinion matters. Will it win a game for you, no however, how others view your favorite team has a small level of importance to the individuals involved. Rankings are a part of the game like fans are. "Expert" opinions matter.Why do rankings matter? Shouldn’t the only thing that matters is winning a title instead of being the best in someone’s opinion?
I think Mt. Carmel would have beaten Marengo, Wheaton Academy, Genoa and Ricmond Burton.
This is what is wrong with worrying about rankings, and perception of program's strengths. Because SF and Phillips lost to " Farm Schools",( my words, not yours) your perception of the strength of JCA's playoff opponents is lessened?I’ve been extremely critical of JCA going 4a. With that said their playoff run was supposed to look like this:
Marengo
Wheaton Acd
Wheaton St Francis
Phillips
Rochester/SHG
If that were to have happened…I wonder if everyone’s opinions (mine included) would be a littler different.
It's something I've been strong on forever. The reason why I am okay with schools leapfrogging JCA is because we're talking about proving it on the field by beating the other schools in the conversation and not trying to project what would happen in a hypothetical matchup. We all thought Loyola looked the strongest, but due to being 8A they had to prove it on the field. Lockport didnt necessarily look the strongest and I saw them close up. But they proved it on the field. So how much confidence do we put into "team X looks the strongest" vs "team X actually proved it on the field"? I am going with the latter 100% of the time.
Same reason I push back against crowning EStL, and I love that program. Hell, I like JCA. What I like more than anything is teams playing who they should play and seeing what happens.
In a purely theoretical sense you would be correct. In a real-world sense I'm not so sure for a couple of reasons.No but you are arguing that no way can jca be number 1 simply because they are in 4a.
If you put ESL, Loyola, Lockport, etc in 3a, it wouldnt change the fact those teams are as good as any team in the state.
If Georgia played in the Sun Belt, they would still be the best team in college football.