Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Time for the ESCC to move in to the CCL.
Or CCL to move to the ESCCI'd be pretty cool wouldn't it? Doubt it happens however.
For a few it may make sense. Both Marians are long distance outliers from the core of their conference. Of the Heights may seek a way into the lower CCL division or join the Southland or SSC. Come to think of it, perhaps only Benet, ND, Carmel and Viator are the true core of ESCC. JCA is iffy, Naz might fall out of favor, Marist is more CCL Blue and Pats would be CCL green or white.Eventually don't you think the private schools eventually join their local public school conference in their area? (Just like SHG)
This seems like where everything is headed.
If the ESCC could pick up Marmion and Loyola, then you could have a true North/South 6 team divisions.
Eventually don't you think the private schools eventually join their local public school conference in their area? (Just like SHG)
This seems like where everything is headed.
Not sure what u mean by JCA is iffy. Joliet Catholic is a founding member of the ESCC and has no intention of leaving.For a few it may make sense. Both Marians are long distance outliers from the core of their conference. Of the Heights may seek a way into the lower CCL division or join the Southland or SSC. Come to think of it, perhaps only Benet, ND, Carmel and Viator are the true core of ESCC. JCA is iffy, Naz might fall out of favor, Marist is more CCL Blue and Pats would be CCL green or white.
Not even Lourdes toward the end.The Catholic League should've called Dr Phil, since he has experience with the type. .
Right. But everyone with eyes can see that Smart and Washington are gone now. But the return to glory was cute.You could make the argument that Larr--, sorry, Saint Laurence, should be in the top division ahead of Saint Rita based on the last couple years.
You could make the argument that Larr--, sorry, Saint Laurence, should be in the top division ahead of Saint Rita based on the last couple years.
My guess is:
MC, SR, BR, PC, LA
Montini, Marmion, Friar, DLS, Laurence
DePaul, Leo, Joe's Hope, Ignatius
in a perfect world it is like 1996-1999 when they did combine
Why didn't merging the conferences work the first time?
If they did merge why would it work this time when it didn't before?
Why didn't merging the conferences work the first time?
If they did merge why would it work this time when it didn't before?
Kind of curious since a lot of people around here seem to like the thought of merging.
JCA was not a founding member of the ESCC.Not sure what u mean by JCA is iffy. Joliet Catholic is a founding member of the ESCC and has no intention of leaving.
St.Laurence sophs were 2-7 last year
Normally, I would have contributed to this thread long before now. It's the sort of topic that really interests me and that I like to discuss with other posters. It has taken this long for me to jump in the conversation because I'm just sorta sad about the whole thing, and I don't really have that much to add at this point.
I'm not all that sad about losing the old SCC schools that are leaving. Didn't have much time to develop an affinity with them. I'm a little sad about Mac leaving because of their relative longevity in the CCL. I'm sad for schools like Leo, St. Joe, and DePaul Prep who will no longer have as many similarly sized schools within the CCL to compete against. Mostly, I'm sad that the CCL, and other private schools, just can't seem to get it together and realize that strength and flexibility lie in their numbers and in their combined voices.
Has there ever been a meeting of the private school minds with respect to athletics in general, and conference alignment in particular, to try to identify common ground? No. We'd hear about it if that ever happened. About the closest we came to it was around the time of the multiplier when that was being forced down private school throats and when 30+ private schools banded together to try to stop the IHSA from violating its own rules.
Seriously, wouldn't it make sense to sit down and just talk with each other once every 2-3 years? Understand each other's needs a little better? Forge relationships? Create larger professional networks? Organize ourselves?
We are not being divided and conquered because that implies an outside party that is doing it to us. Instead, we're doing it to ourselves.
So here were are as interested fans with passion and ideas about how the future should be forged. Perhaps there are "higher ups" and decision makers within the CCL and ESCC or even other conferences having discussions. How are we to know?
Then again, maybe there are no discussions. Again, how are we to know? As fans, we are blind to what is happening. You wake up one day and read the news and realize the plans were in the works for over a year.
I have to believe the decision makers of these conferences read the Edgy board. Why would they not? We are their constituents in many ways. We are the voice of the fans. Therefore, I have to believe our voices are being heard. Yet what is being done about it, I don't know. Does anyone?
The CCL leadership has got to be freaking out. Things are not going well for them. I think it will get worse before it gets better.
I knew over a year ago that AC was seeking to leave the CCL. I did not mention anything here because I believed it would be a violation of trust and disrespect to the decision makers at AC. What shocked me was the departure of B-Mac and St. Francis.
When I knew AC had designs on leaving, I voiced my concern here that the CCL needed to expand the number smaller schools in order to insulate small schools from futile CCL Blue matchups. If the CCL were able to pull ICCP and ACC and St. Ed's into the CCL, I believe they would have been able to retain AC and B-mac.
St. Francis clearly wanted a reprieve from CCL Green down to White and would have been a wise move. Push Larry up to CCL Green as a swap. Moves could have been made to create a more competitive environment instead of allowing dissatisfied schools to find a more suitable conference. Make the CCL more suitable. Make the CCL the destination. Why did this not happen? Can anyone answer this?
In the end, I am happy for AC to have opportunity to play ACC, St. Ed, ICCP and St. Francis. Those are good matchups and good geography. I only wish they were happening in context of the CCL - not the Metro Suburban.
I suggested something like this awhile back. Ramblin has posted against many of the crossovers in the CCL for years. Any conference that allows for games, such as: BR/Joe's, MC/DePaul, LA/Leo etc. has issues. Those types of games simply should not be played. Have to believe part of the reason AC and BMac left the CCL is to avoid games like that. Still surprised Francis left.If no one wants to do crossovers with the CCL Blue (can't say I blame them) and it's causing strife and friction and departures from other CCL divisions - what about CCL Blue only playing each other and either they or the remains of the DVC reach out to one another for a long term 2 to 3 non conference home and away schedule?
Would this stabilize the CCL for all divisions or help some? I would think It would definitely be a benefit to the remains of the DVC for football scheduling 2018 and beyond. And finally - I think there would be some good matchups to watch and intriguing games.
Thoughts?
So here were are as interested fans with passion and ideas about how the future should be forged. Perhaps there are "higher ups" and decision makers within the CCL and ESCC or even other conferences having discussions. How are we to know?
Then again, maybe there are no discussions. Again, how are we to know? As fans, we are blind to what is happening. You wake up one day and read the news and realize the plans were in the works for over a year.
I suggested something like this awhile back. Ramblin has posted against many of the crossovers in the CCL for years. Any conference that allows for games, such as: BR/Joe's, MC/DePaul, LA/Leo etc. has issues. Those types of games simply should not be played. Have to believe part of the reason AC and BMac left the CCL is to avoid games like that. Still surprised Francis left.
If no one wants to do crossovers with the CCL Blue (can't say I blame them) and it's causing strife and friction and departures from other CCL divisions - what about CCL Blue only playing each other and either they or the remains of the DVC reach out to one another for a long term 2 to 3 non conference home and away schedule?
Would this stabilize the CCL for all divisions or help some? I would think It would definitely be a benefit to the remains of the DVC for football scheduling 2018 and beyond. And finally - I think there would be some good matchups to watch and intriguing games.
Thoughts?
Sounds like a good short term solution.
However, the answer for long term is getting the CCL and ESCC to work something out. There are enough 7A/8A schools and 5A/6A schools between the two of them to make it work.