who decided to add the multiplier waiver, what a disaster. without the waiver althoff is in 3a cc in 4a montini 5a depaul 6a this year. would completely change the public/private look this year.
i would support moving to remove the waiver, but this slate could result a much more dramatic reaction
Just have true 1 to 32 seeding. In 3a it should be Byron vs Montini.
i agree with all 3 of these. 1-32 should increase competition in the state game. you don't necessarily need to remove waiver but make it the rolling instead of windows, and maybe x games over 3 years so it takes more than one down class to lose it.I do think the waiver should be harder to obtain. I think they should get rid of SF or make it for everyone
I’ve heard that it was a holdover from the districts thing that got voted in then rescinded. Not 100% sure though.I’ve read plenty of messages about people disagreeing with the 2 year enrollment process. What’s the reasoning behind it? Is it really that tedious to get yearly enrollment numbers?
193-28 point differential in four championship games is wild to meAnd outscored opponents 146-14 with a quarter to go for Montini.
Using the current setup, Montini wouldn't have been #2Just have true 1 to 32 seeding. In 3a it should be Byron vs Montini.
Problem is 1/32 seeding using current seeding process woujd have had Plano number 1 and losing to number 14 Montini in semifinals that would still result in Montini wiping out somebody at ISU.Using the current setup, Montini wouldn't have been #2
1A and 2A traditionally the private schools have struggled. Even this year most of the private schools in 1A were out early.It is obvious that something needs to change - putting private schools in a seperate playoff would not be a bad idea as other states do it. Publics, especially the smaller ones cannot compete with the recruiting advantages that private have for the most part.
I'd make all the non-tiny privates play at least 6A. A CCL school playing below that level is unfair to the smaller private schools.It is obvious that something needs to change - putting private schools in a seperate playoff would not be a bad idea as other states do it. Publics, especially the smaller ones cannot compete with the recruiting advantages that private have for the most part.
Of course they can. Being an IHSA member school is voluntary. If enough private schools left, they could certainly form their own organization.If Catholic and public schools were separated for playoffs, can Catholic schools leave the IHSA and form their own governance?
The 5-0 reference was to private schools winning the first 5 title games at ISU and public schools winning 0.Shouldn’t it be 5 and 1.
Actually…5-0The 5-0 reference was to private schools winning the first 5 title games at ISU and public schools winning 0.
You are obviously referring to the fact that after 5?games are played that private schools will have a 5-1 record.
Two things csn be true at the same time.
Le-Win would’ve beat Maroa, Monticello, and Mt. Zion. I feel like the best teams from the south got beat 2A-4A. The playoff still needs adjustments though.193-28 point differential in four championship games is wild to me
193-28 point differential in four championship games is wild to me