So student-athletes are continuing to compete for conference and, in some cases, regional or sectional championships. Yet, the players/coaches come from vastly different learning models ranging from completely in-person to fully remote with shades in-between. Is this an equitable situation expected to produce fair results? Would any model be overall more or less advantageous? How about the factors that are pros or cons of each within the three types?
"Level" playing fields?
- Thread starter johnndoe
- Start date
I think we just need to be thankful that kids are getting the opportunity to play again just for the sake of competing and getting out of the bunker. Anything that happened in 2020 and early 2021 needs to be taken with a grain of salt and hope we’re back to normal in the fall.
Its never "fair". Just different reasons this year on top of the normal ones.
