I realize this post might be inflammatory for some, but here goes..
I don't see how JCA can win. Furthermore, 5A was obviously very lopsided with their bracketing. JCA got shellacked by IC 42-0. I realize that JCA got better as the year went on, but I'm thinking that the same could be said for most teams, especially those still playing this weekend and next.
Prove me wrong.
History on this board has shown us jca broskis are pretty hip to reality and all that jazz.
I think in almost every other jca bronco match up, I have called them toss ups. In this game, jca is a true underdog.
Regarding the IC game, that one is hard to explain. If you saw the first five minutes of the game, you would have thought jca was going to roll... turnovers kicked in...things got out of hand. IMO, it's the wrong game to judge jca on.
That said, perhaps relative to bronco, Naz and Marist are better barometers, and those games were not too great for the Hill.
Also agree that most teams improve during the season, but I think it's relative, also, and I would suspect that jca has improved more than most teams. Going into the season, they had one of the scattiest backs ready to rush and receive for over 1k...that changed when he got injured in the first quarter of the first game, and was ruled out for the year. That takes time to adjust to...it's not the same losing a player of that csliber.
Since then younger bloods have stepped up, and game experience helps, I think that is what you are seeing, along with the obvious sos factor.
Jca is an underdog, but no one should be surprised if the game ends up close or jca wins. They are very talented, it's just bronco has more and has been tested equally to jca. This is not a matter of bronco just simply over matching jca.
I hope jca plays with a wreclkess abandon and causes turnovers, had a trick play or two, and otherwise plays a solid game. If they do, they'll be where they need to be in the 4th quarter; and, I'll take that any day of the week.